LITPvsNUKZETF Comparison
VS
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LITP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Utilities and Non-Corporate. In contrast, NUKZ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. LITP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.85% for NUKZ. LITP is down -2.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. NUKZ performs better with 2.08% YTD performance, and +$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LITP and NUKZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LITP vs NUKZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LITP NUKZ | +17.21%-0.74% | -27.47%-9.81% | -2.75%+2.08% | +62.78%+12.95% | -13.72%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | LITP NUKZ | --$28M | -$4M-$52M | +$5M+$9M | +$13M+$197M | +$29M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LITP NUKZ | +44.84%+26.64% | +47.04%+27.68% | +41.62%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | LITP NUKZ | -38.67%-15.76% | -44.08%-19.49% | -67.97%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LITP NUKZ | 92d91d | 118d120d | 853dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
LITP | NUKZ | |
Last sale 9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $11.45 | $65.70 |
| Previous close 09/03/2026 | $11.74 | $64.92 |
| Consolidated volume 09/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LITP | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LITP | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $11.45 | $65.70 |
| 1D performance | -2.46% | +1.20% |
| AuM | $42.53 M | $743.38 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
LITP | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index | VettaFi Nuclear Renaissance Index |
| N° of holdings | 39 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | January 23, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LITP
Australia
39.51%
Canada
14.6%
China
13.63%
Chile
12.32%
USA
10.96%
Other
8.97%
NUKZ
USA
52.97%
Canada
10.23%
Republic of Korea
9.61%
Japan
7.51%
Other
19.69%
Sectors
LITP
Non-Energy Materi.
95.99%
Other
4.01%
NUKZ
Industrials
50.7%
Utilities
33.39%
Energy
9.01%
Other
6.9%
Advertisement
Diversification
LITP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
85.7%
NUKZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.77%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LITP
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
12.32%
Albemarle Corp.
10.52%
PLS Group Ltd.
9.90%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
9.02%
Liontown Ltd.
6.15%
IGO Ltd.
5.38%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
4.61%
Lithium Argentina AG
4.44%
Elevra Lithium Ltd.
4.35%
Lithium Americas Corp.
4.23%
Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd.
3.77%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
3.24%
PMET Resources, Inc.
2.80%
Core Lithium Ltd.
2.55%
Standard Lithium Ltd.
2.42%
NUKZ
Cameco Corp.
7.86%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.85%
Endesa SA
3.76%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
3.73%
CEZ as
3.58%
Dominion Energy, Inc.
3.40%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.34%
Talen Energy Corp.
3.19%
PG&E Corp.
2.97%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.94%
Emerson Electric Co.
2.91%
Fortum Oyj
2.88%
Vistra Corp.
2.87%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.75%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.73%
Frequently asked questions about LITP and NUKZ
How have the LITP and NUKZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, LITP is down -2.75% year-to-date (YTD), while NUKZ has returned 2.08%. That puts NUKZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LITP or NUKZ?
Year-to-date, the LITP ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$9M for NUKZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: LITP or NUKZ?
Over the past year, LITP had a volatility of 47.04%, while NUKZ experienced 27.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: LITP or NUKZ?
As of September 2, 2026, LITP holds $42.53 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUKZ manages $743.38 M.
What sectors do the LITP and NUKZ ETFs invest in?
LITP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, NUKZ focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the LITP ETF and NUKZ ETF?
LITP top holdings include Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, Albemarle Corp. and PLS Group Ltd.. NUKZ holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., GE Vernova, Inc. and Endesa SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: LITP or NUKZ?
LITP holds 39 securities with 85.7% of its assets in the top 15. NUKZ has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.77%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LITP & NUKZ
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
LITP
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Range ETFs Debuts New Lineup of 4 Thematic Energy ETFs on NYSE ARCA
February 6, 2024
NUKZ
Advertisement
Sprott Launches Four New Lithium, Uranium and Copper Miners ETFs
February 15, 2023
LITP
Sprott Launches Four New Lithium, Uranium and Copper Miners ETFs
February 15, 2023
LITP
Advertisement
