LITPvsIONETF Comparison
VS
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LITP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Utilities and Non-Corporate. In contrast, ION's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Energy. LITP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.58% for ION. LITP is down -36.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. ION performs better with -19.65% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LITP and ION below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LITP vs ION performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LITP ION | -24.30%-14.24% | -31.68%-12.45% | -36.94%-19.65% | -22.97%+1.95% | -35.00%+38.25% | n/an/a |
| Flows | LITP ION | -- | -- | +$5M+$5M | +$9M+$10M | +$28M+$10M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LITP ION | +37.16%+26.10% | +45.37%+34.07% | +41.82%+28.05% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | LITP ION | -37.88%-24.15% | -57.12%-38.49% | -63.32%-38.49% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LITP ION | 52d53d | 161d162d | 794d162d | n/an/a |
Trading data
LITP | ION | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $7.47 | $40.58 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $7.51 | $40.96 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LITP | ION | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LITP | ION | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $7.47 | $40.58 |
| 1D performance | -0.51% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $27.58 M | $10.34 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.58% |
Characteristics
LITP | ION | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | ProShares |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index | S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index |
| N° of holdings | 39 | 51 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | November 29, 2022 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LITP
Australia
41.9%
Canada
13.9%
China
12.75%
Chile
12.14%
USA
10.56%
Other
8.75%
ION
China
31.05%
Australia
17.26%
South Africa
9.91%
Indonesia
8.68%
Other
33.09%
Sectors
LITP
Non-Energy Materi.
96.34%
Other
3.66%
ION
Non-Energy Materi.
87.12%
Other
12.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
LITP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
86.28%
ION
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.59%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
LITP
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
12.14%
PLS Group Ltd.
10.96%
Albemarle Corp.
10.09%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
8.39%
Liontown Ltd.
6.64%
IGO Ltd.
5.79%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
4.37%
Lithium Argentina AG
4.19%
Elevra Lithium Ltd.
4.09%
Lithium Americas Corp.
3.81%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
3.47%
Core Lithium Ltd.
3.43%
Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd.
3.39%
PMET Resources, Inc.
2.89%
Standard Lithium Ltd.
2.64%
ION
Pacific Metals Co., Ltd.
4.26%
IGO Ltd.
4.23%
PT Vale Indonesia Tbk
3.65%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.40%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
3.22%
Elevra Lithium Ltd.
3.21%
African Rainbow Minerals Ltd.
3.02%
Mineral Resources Ltd.
2.82%
Albemarle Corp.
2.81%
Tibet Mineral Development Co., Ltd.
2.74%
Liontown Ltd.
2.74%
PT Timah (Persero) Tbk
2.71%
Eramet SA
2.71%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
2.60%
Zangge Mining Co., Ltd.
2.47%
Frequently asked questions about LITP and ION
How have the LITP and ION ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, LITP is down -36.94% year-to-date (YTD), while ION has lost -19.65%. That puts ION better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LITP or ION?
Year-to-date, the LITP ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$5M for ION.
Which ETF is more volatile: LITP or ION?
Over the past year, LITP had a volatility of 45.37%, while ION experienced 34.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: LITP or ION?
As of October 15, 2026, LITP holds $27.58 M in assets under management (AUM), while ION manages $10.34 M.
What sectors do the LITP and ION ETFs invest in?
LITP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, ION focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the LITP ETF and ION ETF?
LITP top holdings include Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, PLS Group Ltd. and Albemarle Corp.. ION holds in its top three: Pacific Metals Co., Ltd., IGO Ltd. and PT Vale Indonesia Tbk.
Which ETF is more diversified: LITP or ION?
LITP holds 39 securities with 86.28% of its assets in the top 15. ION has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 46.59%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LITP & ION
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
LITP
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Sprott Launches Four New Lithium, Uranium and Copper Miners ETFs
February 15, 2023
LITP
Advertisement
Proshares' Simeon Hyman
January 10, 2023
ION
Proshares' Simeon Hyman
January 10, 2023
ION
Advertisement
