LITLvsIWMIETF Comparison
ETF 1
LITL
Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.63%
VS
Simplify Piper Sandler US Small-Cap PLUS Income ETF (LITL) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. LITL's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, IWMI's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. LITL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.91%, versus 0.78% for IWMI. LITL is up 17.67% year-to-date (YTD) with +$108K in YTD flows. IWMI performs worse with 16.54% YTD performance, and +$571M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LITL and IWMI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LITL vs IWMI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LITL IWMI | +6.04%+1.85% | +12.54%+6.73% | +17.67%+16.54% | +29.40%+30.40% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | LITL IWMI | +$17K+$117M | +$81K+$303M | +$108K+$571M | +$136K+$802M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LITL IWMI | +15.51%+14.35% | +18.31%+15.25% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | LITL IWMI | -4.15%-3.47% | -9.39%-8.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LITL IWMI | 20d16d | 84d46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
LITL | IWMI | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.37 | $52.87 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $34.29 | $53.08 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LITL | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.37 | $52.87 |
| 1D performance | +0.24% | -0.40% |
| AuM | $6.88 M | $1.08 B |
| E/R | 0.91% | 0.78% |
Characteristics
LITL | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Simplify | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 170 | 1915 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 28, 2025 | June 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LITL
USA
86.87%
Other
13.13%
IWMI
USA
92.94%
Other
7.06%
Sectors
LITL
Finance
27.58%
Healthcare
19.54%
Technology
10.26%
Other
42.62%
IWMI
Finance
22.32%
Technology
17.44%
Healthcare
15.95%
Industrials
15.55%
Other
28.75%
Advertisement
Diversification
LITL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
12.91%
IWMI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
LITL
US912797UW50
1.62%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.97%
US912797UK13
0.89%
Veracyte, Inc.
0.86%
EverQuote, Inc.
0.85%
Garrett Motion, Inc.
0.84%
Anterix, Inc.
0.83%
Willdan Group, Inc.
0.81%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
0.78%
CECO Environmental Corp.
0.78%
PACS Group, Inc.
0.76%
PrimeEnergy Resources Corp.
0.74%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.74%
IBEX Ltd.
0.73%
Atlanticus Holdings Corp.
0.73%
IWMI
Bloom Energy Corp.
1.81%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
1.11%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.74%
Fabrinet
0.69%
Nextpower, Inc.
0.66%
IonQ, Inc.
0.62%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
0.57%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
0.52%
EchoStar Corp.
0.51%
Guardant Health, Inc.
0.47%
SiTime Corp.
0.46%
Rambus, Inc.
0.46%
Dycom Industries, Inc.
0.43%
Modine Manufacturing Co.
0.42%
Semtech Corp.
0.41%
Frequently asked questions about LITL and IWMI
How have the LITL and IWMI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 16, 2026, LITL is up 17.67% year-to-date (YTD), while IWMI has returned 16.54%. That puts LITL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LITL or IWMI?
Year-to-date, the LITL ETF saw +$108K in flows, compared to +$571M for IWMI.
Which ETF is more volatile: LITL or IWMI?
Over the past year, LITL had a volatility of 18.31%, while IWMI experienced 15.25%.
Which ETF is bigger: LITL or IWMI?
As of July 16, 2026, LITL holds $6.88 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWMI manages $1.08 B.
What sectors do the LITL and IWMI ETFs invest in?
LITL leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, IWMI focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the LITL ETF and IWMI ETF?
LITL top holdings include US912797UW50, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. and US912797UK13. IWMI holds in its top three: Bloom Energy Corp., Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LITL or IWMI?
LITL holds 171 securities with 12.91% of its assets in the top 15. IWMI has 1939 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.88%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
