LITvsURNJETF Comparison
VS
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, URNJ's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. LIT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.8% for URNJ. LIT is up 3.39% year-to-date (YTD) with -$74M in YTD flows. URNJ performs worse with -15.01% YTD performance, and +$29M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and URNJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LIT vs URNJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT URNJ | -13.42%-8.48% | -21.41%-31.69% | +3.39%-15.01% | +56.45%+3.64% | +3.07%+52.17% | -15.14%n/a |
| Flows | LIT URNJ | -$76M+$8M | -$128M-$6M | -$74M+$29M | -$77M+$13M | -$1.35B+$301M | -$1.23B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT URNJ | +29.82%+45.52% | +28.56%+50.11% | +26.45%+44.45% | +26.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown | LIT URNJ | -25.52%-33.83% | -25.52%-45.66% | -49.84%-58.46% | -64.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT URNJ | 79d78d | 79d181d | 875d489d | 1710dn/a |
Trading data
LIT | URNJ | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 5:00 PM | $69.51 | $21.69 |
| Previous close 07/29/2026 | $66.74 | $20.88 |
| Consolidated volume 07/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LIT | URNJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/30/2026 at 5:00 PM
Live
Closed
LIT | URNJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $69.51 | $21.69 |
| 1D performance | +4.15% | +3.86% |
| AuM | $1.45 B | $309.80 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.8% |
Characteristics
LIT | URNJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Lithium Index | Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index |
| N° of holdings | 36 | 38 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 22, 2010 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
URNJ
Canada
41.67%
Australia
29.6%
USA
20.97%
Other
7.76%
Sectors
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
URNJ
Energy
87.77%
Other
12.23%
Advertisement
Diversification
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
URNJ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
82.87%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
URNJ
Denison Mines Corp.
12.45%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
12.06%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
11.27%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
11.19%
Deep Yellow Ltd.
4.77%
Ur-Energy, Inc.
4.71%
IsoEnergy Ltd.
4.65%
CGN Mining Co. Ltd.
4.26%
Bannerman Energy Ltd.
3.73%
Boss Energy Ltd.
2.76%
Atha Energy Corp.
2.74%
enCore Energy Corp.
2.61%
Global Atomic Corp.
2.36%
Alligator Energy Ltd.
1.73%
Mega Uranium Ltd.
1.59%
Frequently asked questions about LIT and URNJ
How have the LIT and URNJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 29, 2026, LIT is up 3.39% year-to-date (YTD), while URNJ has lost -15.01%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LIT or URNJ?
Year-to-date, the LIT ETF saw -$74M in flows, compared to +$29M for URNJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: LIT or URNJ?
Over the past year, LIT had a volatility of 28.56%, while URNJ experienced 50.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: LIT or URNJ?
As of July 29, 2026, LIT holds $1.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while URNJ manages $309.80 M.
What sectors do the LIT and URNJ ETFs invest in?
LIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, URNJ focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the LIT ETF and URNJ ETF?
LIT top holdings include Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp.. URNJ holds in its top three: Denison Mines Corp., NexGen Energy Ltd. and Energy Fuels, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LIT or URNJ?
LIT holds 36 securities with 78.8% of its assets in the top 15. URNJ has 42 securities and a top 15 weight of 82.87%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LIT & URNJ
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URNJ
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Advertisement
Advertisement
