LITvsSETMETF Comparison
VS
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, SETM's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. LIT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.65% for SETM. LIT is up 3.54% year-to-date (YTD) with -$74M in YTD flows. SETM performs worse with -1.66% YTD performance, and +$333M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and SETM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LIT vs SETM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT SETM | -13.30%-8.16% | -20.04%-21.35% | +3.54%-1.66% | +55.07%+45.40% | +4.64%+65.61% | -10.70%n/a |
| Flows | LIT SETM | -$76M-$18M | -$128M+$47M | -$74M+$333M | -$77M+$485M | -$1.36B+$530M | -$1.23B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT SETM | +30.08%+40.55% | +28.59%+38.48% | +26.46%+31.44% | +26.26%n/a |
| Max drawdown | LIT SETM | -25.43%-27.19% | -25.43%-28.06% | -49.84%-41.59% | -64.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT SETM | 78d78d | 78d181d | 875d427d | 1709dn/a |
Trading data
LIT | SETM | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 3:17 PM | $66.54 | $27.65 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $66.96 | $28.33 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LIT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 3:17 PM
Live
Closed
LIT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.54 | $27.65 |
| 1D performance | -0.63% | -2.40% |
| AuM | $1.45 B | $505.86 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
LIT | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Lithium Index | Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Index |
| N° of holdings | 36 | 154 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 22, 2010 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
SETM
Canada
31.17%
USA
23.26%
Australia
21.86%
Other
23.71%
Sectors
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
SETM
Non-Energy Materi.
74.01%
Energy
24.12%
Other
1.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
SETM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.42%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
SETM
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
5.37%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
5.33%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
5.08%
Cameco Corp.
5.07%
PLS Group Ltd.
4.20%
Albemarle Corp.
3.69%
MP Materials Corp.
3.42%
Uranium Energy Corp.
3.33%
Teck Resources Limited
3.26%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
3.15%
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura SAA
2.93%
Antofagasta Plc
2.78%
First Majestic Silver Corp.
2.69%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
2.56%
Hecla Mining Co.
2.54%
Frequently asked questions about LIT and SETM
How have the LIT and SETM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, LIT is up 3.54% year-to-date (YTD), while SETM has lost -1.66%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LIT or SETM?
Year-to-date, the LIT ETF saw -$74M in flows, compared to +$333M for SETM.
Which ETF is more volatile: LIT or SETM?
Over the past year, LIT had a volatility of 28.59%, while SETM experienced 38.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: LIT or SETM?
As of July 28, 2026, LIT holds $1.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while SETM manages $505.86 M.
What sectors do the LIT and SETM ETFs invest in?
LIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, SETM focuses on Non-Energy Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the LIT ETF and SETM ETF?
LIT top holdings include Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp.. SETM holds in its top three: Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: LIT or SETM?
LIT holds 36 securities with 78.8% of its assets in the top 15. SETM has 156 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.42%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LIT & SETM
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
SETM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
SETM
Sprott Launches Four New Lithium, Uranium and Copper Miners ETFs
February 15, 2023
SETM
Advertisement
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Advertisement
