LITvsQCLNETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-2.52%
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF (QCLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, QCLN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. LIT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.56% for QCLN. LIT is up 5.29% year-to-date (YTD) with -$60M in YTD flows. QCLN performs better with 10.45% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and QCLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LIT vs QCLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT QCLN | -13.70%-18.67% | -17.91%-13.60% | +5.29%+10.45% | +53.70%+34.61% | +8.01%-7.38% | -11.66%-21.54% |
| Flows | LIT QCLN | -$66M-$81M | -$110M+$756K | -$60M+$27M | -$59M+$23M | -$1.37B-$633M | -$1.12B-$1.09B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT QCLN | +29.75%+53.01% | +28.50%+40.12% | +26.41%+37.28% | +26.28%+39.26% |
| Max drawdown | LIT QCLN | -25.43%-28.04% | -25.43%-28.04% | -49.84%-54.60% | -64.51%-69.47% |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT QCLN | 74d52d | 74d52d | 875d991d | 1705d1719d |
Trading data
LIT | QCLN | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 6:50 PM | $68.13 | $48.92 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $67.81 | $49.26 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LIT | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 6:50 PM
Live
Closed
LIT | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.13 | $48.92 |
| 1D performance | +0.47% | -0.69% |
| AuM | $1.49 B | $603.20 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.56% |
Characteristics
LIT | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Lithium Index | NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 36 | 51 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 22, 2010 | February 8, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
QCLN
USA
91.85%
Other
8.15%
Sectors
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
QCLN
Industrials
32.39%
Technology
32.32%
Consumer Cyclical.
13.81%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.45%
Utilities
8.23%
Other
3.8%
Advertisement
Diversification
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
QCLN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
QCLN
Bloom Energy Corp.
9.07%
Tesla, Inc.
8.72%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
7.60%
ON Semiconductor Corp.
7.01%
First Solar, Inc.
6.76%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
4.71%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
4.12%
Vicor Corp.
3.61%
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
3.58%
Albemarle Corp.
3.45%
Acuity, Inc.
3.39%
Nextpower, Inc.
3.32%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
3.17%
MP Materials Corp.
2.94%
EnerSys
2.45%
Frequently asked questions about LIT and QCLN
How have the LIT and QCLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, LIT is up 5.29% year-to-date (YTD), while QCLN has returned 10.45%. That puts QCLN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LIT or QCLN?
Year-to-date, the LIT ETF saw -$60M in flows, compared to +$27M for QCLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: LIT or QCLN?
Over the past year, LIT had a volatility of 28.5%, while QCLN experienced 40.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: LIT or QCLN?
As of July 24, 2026, LIT holds $1.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while QCLN manages $603.20 M.
What sectors do the LIT and QCLN ETFs invest in?
LIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, QCLN focuses on Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the LIT ETF and QCLN ETF?
LIT top holdings include Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp.. QCLN holds in its top three: Bloom Energy Corp., Tesla, Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LIT or QCLN?
LIT holds 36 securities with 78.8% of its assets in the top 15. QCLN has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.9%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LIT & QCLN
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
QCLN
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
QCLN
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Advertisement
Advertisement
