LITvsPBWETF Comparison
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. In contrast, PBW's top sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. LIT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.63% for PBW. LIT is down -4.33% year-to-date (YTD) with -$243M in YTD flows. PBW performs worse with -18.87% YTD performance, and -$324M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and PBW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LIT vs PBW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT PBW | -9.39%-15.60% | -10.33%-23.44% | -4.33%-18.87% | +3.77%-24.90% | +30.31%+0.96% | -28.71%-66.76% |
| Flows | LIT PBW | -$120M-$135K | -$183M-$16M | -$243M-$324M | -$206M-$211M | -$1.20B-$157M | -$1.85B-$390M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT PBW | +21.44%+36.25% | +26.46%+42.02% | +26.32%+41.27% | +25.93%+43.37% |
| Max drawdown | LIT PBW | -20.94%-29.69% | -32.24%-47.24% | -35.88%-54.99% | -64.51%-84.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT PBW | 64d71d | 169d146d | 617d644d | 1800d1813d |
LIT | PBW | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 7:30 PM | $62.62 | $25.80 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $62.63 | $25.81 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LIT | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LIT | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $62.62 | $25.80 |
| 1D performance | -0.02% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $1.18 B | $282.56 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.63% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
