LITvsNUKZETF Comparison
VS
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, NUKZ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. LIT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.85% for NUKZ. LIT is up 3.54% year-to-date (YTD) with -$74M in YTD flows. NUKZ performs worse with -1.12% YTD performance, and +$46M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and NUKZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LIT vs NUKZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT NUKZ | -13.30%-7.74% | -20.04%-12.79% | +3.54%-1.12% | +55.07%+4.16% | +4.64%n/a | -10.70%n/a |
| Flows | LIT NUKZ | -$76M-$16M | -$128M+$17M | -$74M+$46M | -$77M+$298M | -$1.36B- | -$1.23B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT NUKZ | +30.08%+29.77% | +28.59%+27.58% | +26.46%n/a | +26.26%n/a |
| Max drawdown | LIT NUKZ | -25.43%-17.47% | -25.43%-17.47% | -49.84%n/a | -64.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT NUKZ | 78d83d | 78d83d | 875dn/a | 1709dn/a |
Trading data
LIT | NUKZ | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 3:17 PM | $66.58 | $61.52 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $66.96 | $62.72 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LIT | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 3:17 PM
Live
Closed
LIT | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.58 | $61.52 |
| 1D performance | -0.57% | -1.91% |
| AuM | $1.45 B | $755.84 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
LIT | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Lithium Index | VettaFi Nuclear Renaissance Index |
| N° of holdings | 36 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 22, 2010 | January 23, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
NUKZ
USA
54.74%
Canada
10.93%
Republic of Korea
9.99%
Other
24.34%
Sectors
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
NUKZ
Industrials
50.66%
Utilities
31.59%
Energy
9.91%
Other
7.85%
Advertisement
Diversification
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
NUKZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
NUKZ
Cameco Corp.
8.71%
GE Vernova, Inc.
4.29%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.85%
Talen Energy Corp.
3.44%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
3.40%
Endesa SA
3.31%
Dominion Energy, Inc.
3.16%
CEZ as
3.06%
Solstice Advanced Materials, Inc.
3.02%
Vistra Corp.
2.89%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.79%
Fortum Oyj
2.76%
PG&E Corp.
2.70%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.69%
Emerson Electric Co.
2.61%
Frequently asked questions about LIT and NUKZ
How have the LIT and NUKZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, LIT is up 3.54% year-to-date (YTD), while NUKZ has lost -1.12%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LIT or NUKZ?
Year-to-date, the LIT ETF saw -$74M in flows, compared to +$46M for NUKZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: LIT or NUKZ?
Over the past year, LIT had a volatility of 28.59%, while NUKZ experienced 27.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: LIT or NUKZ?
As of July 28, 2026, LIT holds $1.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while NUKZ manages $755.84 M.
What sectors do the LIT and NUKZ ETFs invest in?
LIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, NUKZ focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the LIT ETF and NUKZ ETF?
LIT top holdings include Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp.. NUKZ holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., GE Vernova, Inc. and Samsung C&T Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: LIT or NUKZ?
LIT holds 36 securities with 78.8% of its assets in the top 15. NUKZ has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 52.67%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LIT & NUKZ
Range ETFs Debuts New Lineup of 4 Thematic Energy ETFs on NYSE ARCA
February 6, 2024
NUKZ
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Advertisement
Advertisement
