LITvsBATTETF Comparison
VS
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT's top 3 sector exposures are Materials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, BATT's top sector exposures are Materials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. LIT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.59% for BATT. LIT is up 30.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$233M in YTD flows. BATT performs worse with 21.58% YTD performance, and +$20M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and BATT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LIT vs BATT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT BATT | +0.89%-1.48% | +16.69%+6.66% | +30.98%+21.58% | +127.31%+94.94% | +37.78%+44.16% | +40.60%+23.44% |
| Flows | LIT BATT | +$184M+$11M | +$177M+$11M | +$233M+$20M | +$265M+$27M | -$1.09B-$27M | -$586M+$8M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT BATT | +28.48%+29.32% | +26.77%+23.79% | +25.66%+23.16% | +26.15%+24.41% |
| Max drawdown | LIT BATT | -10.62%-14.11% | -10.62%-14.11% | -51.18%-46.41% | -64.51%-60.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT BATT | 41d47d | 41d47d | 895d799d | 1642d1646d |
Trading data
LIT | BATT | |
Last sale 5/22/2026 at 1:30 PM | $85.28 | $16.71 |
| Previous close 05/21/2026 | $84.38 | $16.67 |
| Consolidated volume 05/21/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LIT | BATT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/22/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LIT | BATT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $85.28 | $16.71 |
| 1D performance | +1.07% | +0.24% |
| AuM | $2.18 B | $136.49 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
LIT | BATT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Lithium Index | EQM Lithium & Battery Technology Index |
| N° of holdings | 32 | 42 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 22, 2010 | June 6, 2018 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LIT
USA
36.65%
China
33.92%
Republic of Korea
10.68%
Australia
8.81%
Other
9.94%
BATT
China
27.3%
USA
24.2%
Australia
14.06%
Canada
7.52%
Other
26.92%
Sectors
LIT
Materials
32.31%
Industrials
18.91%
Information Techn.
12.01%
Consumer Discreti.
9.95%
Other
26.82%
BATT
Materials
50.6%
Consumer Discreti.
18.47%
Industrials
14.77%
Other
16.16%
Diversification
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.46%
BATT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.03%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
LIT
US7672041008
20.40%
ALBEMARLE
7.37%
SAMSUNG SDI
4.73%
PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION
4.25%
GANFENG LITHIUM
4.23%
US8336351056
4.07%
PILBARA MINERALS
3.96%
NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
3.78%
AMPEREX TECH
3.70%
BYD
3.17%
EVE ENERGY
2.91%
TIANQI LITHIUM
2.82%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
2.76%
TINCI MATERIALS
2.70%
TDK
2.61%
BATT
AMPEREX TECH
8.36%
BHP GROUP LTD
6.94%
BYD
6.57%
TESLA
6.45%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
4.94%
GRUPO MEXICO
2.51%
TDK
2.20%
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
2.19%
ALBEMARLE
2.17%
GANFENG LITHIUM CO LTD
2.14%
TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
2.08%
SAMSUNG SDI
1.92%
TINCI MATERIALS
1.92%
PILBARA MINERALS
1.85%
SHOWA DENKO
1.79%
Frequently asked questions about LIT and BATT
How have the LIT and BATT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 22, 2026, LIT is up 30.98% year-to-date (YTD), while BATT has returned 21.58%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LIT or BATT?
Year-to-date, the LIT ETF saw +$233M in flows, compared to +$20M for BATT.
Which ETF is more volatile: LIT or BATT?
Over the past year, LIT had a volatility of 26.77%, while BATT experienced 23.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: LIT or BATT?
As of May 22, 2026, LIT holds $2.18 B in assets under management (AUM), while BATT manages $136.49 M.
What sectors do the LIT and BATT ETFs invest in?
LIT leans toward sectors like Materials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, BATT focuses on Materials, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the LIT ETF and BATT ETF?
LIT top holdings include US7672041008, ALBEMARLE and SAMSUNG SDI. BATT holds in its top three: AMPEREX TECH, BHP GROUP LTD and BYD.
Which ETF is more diversified: LIT or BATT?
LIT holds 36 securities with 73.46% of its assets in the top 15. BATT has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 54.03%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LIT & BATT
Tesla’s Rally Propels Consumer Discretionary Index and EV ETFs
July 8, 2024
LIT
BATT
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
BATT
Advertisement
Advertisement
