LITvsBATTETF Comparison
VS
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, BATT's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Consumer Cyclicals and Industrials. LIT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.59% for BATT. LIT is up 17.93% year-to-date (YTD) with -$89M in YTD flows. BATT performs worse with 15.99% YTD performance, and +$18M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and BATT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LIT vs BATT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/21/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT BATT | +11.01%+10.40% | -8.77%-3.31% | +17.93%+15.99% | +70.23%+53.24% | +36.42%+45.21% | -4.62%+6.09% |
| Flows | LIT BATT | -$28M- | -$322M-$1M | -$89M+$18M | -$89M+$30M | -$1.25B-$22M | -$1.45B-$16M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT BATT | +30.21%+32.56% | +28.17%+27.29% | +26.52%+24.21% | +26.08%+24.90% |
| Max drawdown | LIT BATT | -23.04%-20.69% | -25.52%-21.33% | -44.20%-39.09% | -64.51%-60.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT BATT | 82d80d | 102d100d | 764d745d | 1733d1646d |
Trading data
LIT | BATT | |
Last sale 8/21/2026 at 1:30 PM | $76.61 | $15.98 |
| Previous close 08/20/2026 | $74.58 | $15.43 |
| Consolidated volume 08/20/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LIT | BATT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/21/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LIT | BATT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $76.61 | $15.98 |
| 1D performance | +2.72% | +3.56% |
| AuM | $1.64 B | $128.62 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
LIT | BATT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Lithium Index | EQM Lithium & Battery Technology Index |
| N° of holdings | 36 | 49 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 22, 2010 | June 6, 2018 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
BATT
China
31.19%
USA
24.09%
Australia
15.18%
Canada
9.31%
Japan
7.18%
Other
13.05%
Sectors
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
BATT
Non-Energy Materi.
61.23%
Consumer Cyclical.
17.65%
Industrials
16.53%
Other
4.59%
Advertisement
Diversification
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
BATT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.53%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
BATT
BHP Group Ltd.
7.47%
Tesla, Inc.
7.03%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
6.78%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
5.61%
BYD Co., Ltd.
4.46%
Bloom Energy Corp.
4.34%
TDK Corp.
3.48%
Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V.
2.87%
Teck Resources Limited
2.43%
Resonac Holdings Corp.
2.28%
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
2.17%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
2.10%
Antofagasta Plc
1.89%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
1.81%
Lundin Mining Corp.
1.81%
Frequently asked questions about LIT and BATT
How have the LIT and BATT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 21, 2026, LIT is up 17.93% year-to-date (YTD), while BATT has returned 15.99%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LIT or BATT?
Year-to-date, the LIT ETF saw -$89M in flows, compared to +$18M for BATT.
Which ETF is more volatile: LIT or BATT?
Over the past year, LIT had a volatility of 28.17%, while BATT experienced 27.29%.
Which ETF is bigger: LIT or BATT?
As of August 21, 2026, LIT holds $1.64 B in assets under management (AUM), while BATT manages $128.62 M.
What sectors do the LIT and BATT ETFs invest in?
LIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, BATT focuses on Non-Energy Materials, Consumer Cyclicals and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the LIT ETF and BATT ETF?
LIT top holdings include Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp.. BATT holds in its top three: BHP Group Ltd., Tesla, Inc. and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: LIT or BATT?
LIT holds 36 securities with 78.8% of its assets in the top 15. BATT has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.53%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LIT & BATT
Tesla’s Rally Propels Consumer Discretionary Index and EV ETFs
July 8, 2024
LIT
BATT
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
BATT
Advertisement
Advertisement
