Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LGLVvsREVSETF Comparison
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) belongs to the US Low Volatility segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. LGLV's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, REVS's top sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. LGLV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.19% for REVS. LGLV is up 3.21% year-to-date (YTD) with +$21M in YTD flows. REVS performs worse with 1.84% YTD performance, and +$74M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGLV and REVS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LGLV vs REVS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGLV REVS | -2.50%-3.72% | +2.64%+0.55% | +3.21%+1.84% | +9.79%+19.40% | +46.81%+60.84% | +58.95%+71.76% |
| Flows | LGLV REVS | +$41M+$13M | +$28M+$79M | +$21M+$74M | +$197M+$138M | +$267M+$173M | +$348M+$193M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGLV REVS | +8.55%+10.96% | +12.79%+15.96% | +11.01%+13.35% | +13.00%+15.12% |
| Max drawdown | LGLV REVS | -4.50%-4.35% | -9.65%-12.32% | -10.12%-16.16% | -17.49%-17.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | LGLV REVS | 11d30d | 43d46d | 166d211d | 713d448d |
LGLV | REVS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $181.28 | $28.38 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $180.92 | $28.45 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LGLV | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LGLV | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $181.28 | $28.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.20% | -0.25% |
| AuM | $1.17 B | $213.52 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.19% |
LGLV | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 160 | 281 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 20, 2013 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LGLV and REVS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, LGLV is up 3.21% year-to-date (YTD), while REVS has returned 1.84%. That puts LGLV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGLV or REVS?
Year-to-date, the LGLV ETF saw +$21M in flows, compared to +$74M for REVS.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGLV or REVS?
Over the past year, LGLV had a volatility of 12.79%, while REVS experienced 15.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGLV or REVS?
As of March 13, 2026, LGLV holds $1.17 B in assets under management (AUM), while REVS manages $213.52 M.
What sectors do the LGLV and REVS ETFs invest in?
LGLV leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, REVS focuses on Financials, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the LGLV ETF and REVS ETF?
LGLV top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, VULCAN MATERIALS and WALMART INC. REVS holds in its top three: WELLS FARGO, PROCTERGAMBLE and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: LGLV or REVS?
LGLV holds 166 securities with 17.6% of its assets in the top 15. REVS has 285 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.3%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
