Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LGLVvsBMVPETF Comparison
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) belongs to the US Low Volatility segment. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF (BMVP) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. LGLV's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, BMVP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. LGLV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.29% for BMVP. LGLV is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. BMVP performs better with 4.95% YTD performance, and -$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGLV and BMVP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LGLV vs BMVP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGLV BMVP | -1.76%-2.51% | +3.56%+3.04% | +3.73%+4.95% | +8.93%+10.86% | +47.55%+52.70% | +62.59%+40.31% |
| Flows | LGLV BMVP | +$30M- | -$5M-$1M | +$11M-$1M | +$190M-$16M | +$256M-$22M | +$336M-$50M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGLV BMVP | +8.44%+10.61% | +12.81%+14.35% | +11.02%+12.52% | +13.01%+16.47% |
| Max drawdown | LGLV BMVP | -3.84%-3.25% | -9.65%-11.10% | -10.12%-15.00% | -17.49%-26.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | LGLV BMVP | 9d31d | 43d43d | 166d374d | 713d799d |
LGLV | BMVP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $182.13 | $51.20 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $183.17 | $51.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LGLV | BMVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LGLV | BMVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $182.13 | $51.20 |
| 1D performance | -0.57% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $1.16 B | $102.43 M |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.29% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LGLV and BMVP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, LGLV is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD), while BMVP has returned 4.95%. That puts BMVP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGLV or BMVP?
Year-to-date, the LGLV ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to -$1M for BMVP.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGLV or BMVP?
Over the past year, LGLV had a volatility of 12.81%, while BMVP experienced 14.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGLV or BMVP?
As of March 11, 2026, LGLV holds $1.16 B in assets under management (AUM), while BMVP manages $102.43 M.
What sectors do the LGLV and BMVP ETFs invest in?
LGLV leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, BMVP focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the LGLV ETF and BMVP ETF?
LGLV top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, VULCAN MATERIALS and WALMART INC. BMVP holds in its top three: HALLIBURTON, LOCKHEED MARTIN and HOME DEPOT.
Which ETF is more diversified: LGLV or BMVP?
LGLV holds 166 securities with 17.6% of its assets in the top 15. BMVP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.68%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
