Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LGHTvsPINKETF Comparison
Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) and Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) belong to the same industry segment: Healthcare Technology. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. LGHT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.51% for PINK. LGHT is down -8.11% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. PINK performs better with -4.65% YTD performance, and -$74M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGHT and PINK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LGHT vs PINK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGHT PINK | -3.87%-3.57% | -8.66%-6.11% | -8.11%-4.65% | -8.02%+19.49% | n/a+48.10% | n/an/a |
| Flows | LGHT PINK | --$24M | -$101K-$77M | --$74M | +$1M+$85M | -+$182M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGHT PINK | +18.35%+17.45% | +21.19%+19.71% | n/a+16.20% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | LGHT PINK | -12.49%-10.64% | -13.88%-10.64% | n/a-18.81% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LGHT PINK | 63d48d | 135d48d | n/a390d | n/an/a |
LGHT | PINK | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $8.96 | $33.76 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $9.19 | $33.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
LGHT | PINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $8.96 | $33.76 |
| 1D performance | -2.49% | -0.47% |
| AuM | $3.67 M | $257.89 M |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.51% |
LGHT | PINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Langar Investment Management | Simplify |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 48 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2024 | October 7, 2021 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LGHT and PINK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, LGHT is down -8.11% year-to-date (YTD), while PINK has lost -4.65%. That puts PINK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGHT or PINK?
Year-to-date, the LGHT ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$74M for PINK.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGHT or PINK?
Over the past year, LGHT had a volatility of 21.19%, while PINK experienced 19.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGHT or PINK?
As of March 11, 2026, LGHT holds $3.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while PINK manages $257.89 M.
What sectors do the LGHT and PINK ETFs invest in?
LGHT leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, PINK focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the LGHT ETF and PINK ETF?
LGHT top holdings include INTUITIVE SURGICAL, RESMED and US36266G1076. PINK holds in its top three: US6701002056, UNITEDHEALTH GRP and LILLY.
Which ETF is more diversified: LGHT or PINK?
LGHT holds 25 securities with 75.77% of its assets in the top 15. PINK has 57 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.57%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
