Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LGHTvsBMEDETF Comparison
Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) and iShares Health Innovation Active ETF (BMED) belong to the same industry segment: Healthcare Technology. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. LGHT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.77% for BMED. LGHT is down -8.11% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. BMED performs better with -4.83% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGHT and BMED below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LGHT vs BMED performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGHT BMED | -3.87%-4.90% | -8.66%-4.61% | -8.11%-4.83% | -8.02%+16.18% | n/a+28.25% | n/a-0.73% |
| Flows | LGHT BMED | -+$1M | -$101K+$4M | -+$4M | +$1M+$7M | -+$4M | -+$5M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGHT BMED | +18.35%+15.24% | +21.19%+17.95% | n/a+15.51% | n/a+17.58% |
| Max drawdown | LGHT BMED | -12.49%-9.78% | -13.88%-14.01% | n/a-19.76% | n/a-33.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | LGHT BMED | 63d49d | 135d113d | n/a237d | n/a1586d |
LGHT | BMED | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $8.96 | $28.63 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $9.19 | $28.78 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
LGHT | BMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $8.96 | $28.63 |
| 1D performance | -2.49% | -0.52% |
| AuM | $3.67 M | $10.38 M |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.77% |
LGHT | BMED | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Langar Investment Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 110 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2024 | September 29, 2020 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LGHT and BMED ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, LGHT is down -8.11% year-to-date (YTD), while BMED has lost -4.83%. That puts BMED better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGHT or BMED?
Year-to-date, the LGHT ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$4M for BMED.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGHT or BMED?
Over the past year, LGHT had a volatility of 21.19%, while BMED experienced 17.95%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGHT or BMED?
As of March 11, 2026, LGHT holds $3.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while BMED manages $10.38 M.
What sectors do the LGHT and BMED ETFs invest in?
LGHT leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, BMED focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the LGHT ETF and BMED ETF?
LGHT top holdings include INTUITIVE SURGICAL, RESMED and US36266G1076. BMED holds in its top three: JOHNSON&JOHNSON, GILEAD SCIENCES and EXACT SCIENCES.
Which ETF is more diversified: LGHT or BMED?
LGHT holds 25 securities with 75.77% of its assets in the top 15. BMED has 144 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.18%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
