Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LGHvsTSPAETF Comparison
HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF (LGH) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF (TSPA) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. LGH's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, TSPA's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. LGH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1%, versus 0.34% for TSPA. LGH is down -2.44% year-to-date (YTD) with -$9M in YTD flows. TSPA performs better with -0.68% YTD performance, and +$57M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGH and TSPA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LGH vs TSPA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGH TSPA | -3.22%-2.46% | -3.58%-1.38% | -2.44%-0.68% | +25.08%+22.56% | +84.57%+87.57% | +76.39%n/a |
| Flows | LGH TSPA | -$6M+$11M | -$9M+$66M | -$9M+$57M | +$20M+$470M | +$104M+$1.76B | +$238M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGH TSPA | +16.10%+11.96% | +17.88%+18.34% | +16.87%+15.12% | +16.75%n/a |
| Max drawdown | LGH TSPA | -5.38%-3.61% | -11.27%-13.81% | -18.42%-19.15% | -29.00%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LGH TSPA | 58d42d | 48d45d | 206d127d | 806dn/a |
LGH | TSPA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $58.68 | $41.54 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $59.21 | $41.79 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LGH | TSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LGH | TSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.68 | $41.54 |
| 1D performance | -0.90% | -0.60% |
| AuM | $556.42 M | $2.16 B |
| E/R | 1% | 0.34% |
LGH | TSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Howard Capital Management | T. Rowe Price |
| Benchmark | HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 393 | 253 |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 7, 2019 | June 8, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LGH and TSPA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, LGH is down -2.44% year-to-date (YTD), while TSPA has lost -0.68%. That puts TSPA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGH or TSPA?
Year-to-date, the LGH ETF saw -$9M in flows, compared to +$57M for TSPA.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGH or TSPA?
Over the past year, LGH had a volatility of 17.88%, while TSPA experienced 18.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGH or TSPA?
As of March 11, 2026, LGH holds $556.42 M in assets under management (AUM), while TSPA manages $2.16 B.
What sectors do the LGH and TSPA ETFs invest in?
LGH leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, TSPA focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the LGH ETF and TSPA ETF?
LGH top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. TSPA holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: LGH or TSPA?
LGH holds 405 securities with 41.6% of its assets in the top 15. TSPA has 261 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.76%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
