Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LGHvsQRFTETF Comparison
HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF (LGH) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. LGH's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, QRFT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. LGH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1%, versus 0.75% for QRFT. LGH is down -2.31% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. QRFT performs better with -1.19% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGH and QRFT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LGH vs QRFT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGH QRFT | -3.15%-2.30% | -3.24%-1.85% | -2.31%-1.19% | +24.68%+20.67% | +84.98%+72.69% | +79.44%+68.18% |
| Flows | LGH QRFT | -- | -$3M+$2M | -$3M- | +$26M-$787K | +$110M+$8M | +$244M-$16M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGH QRFT | +16.11%+12.95% | +17.89%+18.84% | +16.87%+15.23% | +16.76%+17.80% |
| Max drawdown | LGH QRFT | -5.38%-4.20% | -11.27%-13.84% | -18.42%-20.00% | -29.00%-28.34% |
| Max drawdown duration | LGH QRFT | 57d41d | 48d45d | 206d129d | 806d771d |
LGH | QRFT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.27 | $61.56 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $60.44 | $61.57 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LGH | QRFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LGH | QRFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.27 | $61.56 |
| 1D performance | -1.94% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $563.21 M | $16.95 M |
| E/R | 1% | 0.75% |
LGH | QRFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Howard Capital Management | Qraft AI ETFs |
| Benchmark | HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 393 | 285 |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 7, 2019 | May 1, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LGH and QRFT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, LGH is down -2.31% year-to-date (YTD), while QRFT has lost -1.19%. That puts QRFT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGH or QRFT?
Year-to-date, the LGH ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to - for QRFT.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGH or QRFT?
Over the past year, LGH had a volatility of 17.89%, while QRFT experienced 18.84%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGH or QRFT?
As of March 10, 2026, LGH holds $563.21 M in assets under management (AUM), while QRFT manages $16.95 M.
What sectors do the LGH and QRFT ETFs invest in?
LGH leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QRFT focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the LGH ETF and QRFT ETF?
LGH top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QRFT holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: LGH or QRFT?
LGH holds 405 securities with 41.6% of its assets in the top 15. QRFT has 293 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.28%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
