Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LGHvsGSUSETF Comparison
HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF (LGH) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. LGH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1%, versus 0.09% for GSUS. LGH is down -2.31% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. GSUS performs better with -1.08% YTD performance, and -$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGH and GSUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LGH vs GSUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGH GSUS | -3.15%-2.09% | -3.24%-1.69% | -2.31%-1.08% | +24.68%+22.50% | +84.98%+84.71% | +79.44%+83.90% |
| Flows | LGH GSUS | --$543K | -$3M-$15M | -$3M-$10M | +$26M+$6M | +$110M+$1.10B | +$244M+$1.55B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGH GSUS | +16.11%+11.62% | +17.89%+18.34% | +16.87%+14.95% | +16.76%+17.36% |
| Max drawdown | LGH GSUS | -5.38%-3.51% | -11.27%-13.91% | -18.42%-19.14% | -29.00%-25.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | LGH GSUS | 57d57d | 48d45d | 206d126d | 806d715d |
LGH | GSUS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.21 | $91.90 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $60.44 | $93.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LGH | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LGH | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.21 | $91.90 |
| 1D performance | -2.04% | -1.52% |
| AuM | $563.21 M | $2.94 B |
| E/R | 1% | 0.09% |
LGH | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Howard Capital Management | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index | Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 393 | 400 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 7, 2019 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LGH and GSUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, LGH is down -2.31% year-to-date (YTD), while GSUS has lost -1.08%. That puts GSUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGH or GSUS?
Year-to-date, the LGH ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$10M for GSUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGH or GSUS?
Over the past year, LGH had a volatility of 17.89%, while GSUS experienced 18.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGH or GSUS?
As of March 10, 2026, LGH holds $563.21 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSUS manages $2.94 B.
What sectors do the LGH and GSUS ETFs invest in?
LGH leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GSUS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the LGH ETF and GSUS ETF?
LGH top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GSUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: LGH or GSUS?
LGH holds 405 securities with 41.6% of its assets in the top 15. GSUS has 419 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.2%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
