Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LGCFvsSHRYETF Comparison
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (LGCF) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF (SHRY) is part of the US High Dividend segment. LGCF's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Energy and Health Care. In contrast, SHRY's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Energy. LGCF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.6% for SHRY. LGCF is down -1.16% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. SHRY performs better with 3.63% YTD performance, and +$28K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LGCF and SHRY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LGCF vs SHRY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LGCF SHRY | -3.13%-1.95% | -1.82%+2.63% | -1.16%+3.63% | +14.14%+10.94% | n/a+54.70% | n/a+56.96% |
| Flows | LGCF SHRY | -- | -+$28K | -+$28K | +$671K-$2M | --$6M | --$14M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LGCF SHRY | +11.94%+10.88% | +17.63%+15.70% | n/a+13.28% | n/a+15.94% |
| Max drawdown | LGCF SHRY | -4.91%-4.32% | -14.39%-11.75% | n/a-15.23% | n/a-23.88% |
| Max drawdown duration | LGCF SHRY | 32d10d | 93d37d | n/a208d | n/a717d |
LGCF | SHRY | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.64 | $43.34 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $33.69 | $43.41 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LGCF | SHRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LGCF | SHRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.64 | $43.34 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | -0.15% |
| AuM | $3.03 M | $17.36 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.6% |
LGCF | SHRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Themes Management Company | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index | Bloomberg Shareholder Yield Index |
| N° of holdings | 75 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 13, 2023 | June 20, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LGCF and SHRY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, LGCF is down -1.16% year-to-date (YTD), while SHRY has returned 3.63%. That puts SHRY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LGCF or SHRY?
Year-to-date, the LGCF ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$28K for SHRY.
Which ETF is more volatile: LGCF or SHRY?
Over the past year, LGCF had a volatility of 17.63%, while SHRY experienced 15.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: LGCF or SHRY?
As of March 13, 2026, LGCF holds $3.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while SHRY manages $17.36 M.
What sectors do the LGCF and SHRY ETFs invest in?
LGCF leans toward sectors like Financials, Energy and Health Care. Meanwhile, SHRY focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the LGCF ETF and SHRY ETF?
LGCF top holdings include EXXON, CHEVRON TEXACO and THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP. SHRY holds in its top three: COMCAST, CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INC(NEW) and SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: LGCF or SHRY?
LGCF holds 75 securities with 53.67% of its assets in the top 15. SHRY has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.26%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
