Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LEGRvsBCDFETF Comparison
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) belong to the same industry segment: Blockchain. LEGR's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Communication Services. In contrast, BCDF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Utilities. LEGR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.85% for BCDF. LEGR is down -1.88% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. BCDF performs better with 3.43% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LEGR and BCDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LEGR vs BCDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LEGR BCDF | -4.15%+1.98% | -0.27%+3.91% | -1.88%+3.43% | +22.67%+17.15% | +75.83%+66.99% | +62.04%n/a |
| Flows | LEGR BCDF | -- | -+$2M | -+$2M | +$13M+$6M | -$33M+$15M | +$15M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LEGR BCDF | +13.48%+14.48% | +15.66%+14.18% | +13.42%+12.81% | +16.06%n/a |
| Max drawdown | LEGR BCDF | -6.80%-7.02% | -13.75%-9.23% | -14.24%-13.11% | -31.53%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LEGR BCDF | 43d53d | 44d27d | 80d151d | 784dn/a |
LEGR | BCDF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $58.40 | $31.05 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $58.13 | $30.95 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LEGR | BCDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LEGR | BCDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.40 | $31.05 |
| 1D performance | +0.46% | +0.32% |
| AuM | $122.52 M | $20.96 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.85% |
LEGR | BCDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | Horizon Kinetics LLC |
| Benchmark | Indxx Blockchain Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 85 | 24 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 24, 2018 | August 1, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LEGR and BCDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, LEGR is down -1.88% year-to-date (YTD), while BCDF has returned 3.43%. That puts BCDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LEGR or BCDF?
Year-to-date, the LEGR ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$2M for BCDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: LEGR or BCDF?
Over the past year, LEGR had a volatility of 15.66%, while BCDF experienced 14.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: LEGR or BCDF?
As of March 12, 2026, LEGR holds $122.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while BCDF manages $20.96 M.
What sectors do the LEGR and BCDF ETFs invest in?
LEGR leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Communication Services. Meanwhile, BCDF focuses on Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the LEGR ETF and BCDF ETF?
LEGR top holdings include MICRON TECHNOLOGY, SAMSUNG ELECTR and INTEL-T. BCDF holds in its top three: CBOE GLOBAL MARKETS INC, NASDAQ INC and SINGAPORE EXCHANGE.
Which ETF is more diversified: LEGR or BCDF?
LEGR holds 99 securities with 26.86% of its assets in the top 15. BCDF has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 64.61%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
