LDRTvsBAMBETF Comparison
VS
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) belongs to the US Government Bonds segment. Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) is part of the US Aggregate Bonds segment. Both ETFs have the same top 2 sector exposures: Sovereign and Non-Corporate. LDRT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.07%, versus 1.01% for BAMB. LDRT is up 0.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$237M in YTD flows. BAMB performs worse with -2.92% YTD performance, and -$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LDRT and BAMB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LDRT vs BAMB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LDRT BAMB | +0.35%-0.12% | -0.38%-2.16% | +0.32%-2.92% | +0.80%-2.91% | n/a+9.25% | n/an/a |
| Flows | LDRT BAMB | +$26M-$1M | +$129M-$3M | +$237M-$8M | +$250M-$8M | -+$54M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LDRT BAMB | +1.85%+3.87% | +1.59%+3.75% | n/a+3.93% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | LDRT BAMB | -1.41%-3.24% | -1.41%-5.49% | n/a-5.49% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LDRT BAMB | 52d51d | 52d228d | n/a228d | n/an/a |
Trading data
LDRT | BAMB | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.63 | $25.12 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $24.67 | $25.19 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 20, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BAMB
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLDRT | BAMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LDRT | BAMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.63 | $25.12 |
| 1D performance | -0.14% | -0.28% |
| AuM | $264.39 M | $54.35 M |
| E/R | 0.07% | 1.01% |
Characteristics
LDRT | BAMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Brookstone Asset Management |
| Benchmark | BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 182 | 101 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 7, 2024 | September 27, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LDRT
USA
97.82%
Other
2.18%
BAMB
USA
97.09%
Other
2.91%
Sectors
LDRT
Sovereign
97.41%
Other
2.59%
BAMB
Sovereign
96.61%
Other
3.39%
Diversification
LDRT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.91%
BAMB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.47%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
LDRT
USA, Notes 4% 28feb2030, USD (H-2030)
1.40%
USA, Notes 1.25% 15aug2031, USD (E-2031)
1.38%
USA, Notes 1.375% 15nov2031, USD (F-2031)
1.36%
USA, Notes 1.625% 15may2031, USD (C-2031)
1.29%
USA, Notes 0.875% 15nov2030, USD (F-2030)
1.28%
USA, Notes 1.125% 15feb2031, USD (B-2031)
1.28%
USA, Notes 0.625% 15aug2030, USD (E-2030)
1.21%
USA, Notes 4.125% 30jun2031, USD (AA-2031)
1.01%
USA, Notes 4.125% 31may2031, USD (Z-2031)
0.99%
USA, Notes 3.875% 31mar2031, USD (W-2031)
0.96%
USA, Notes 3.875% 30apr2031, USD (Y-2031)
0.96%
USA, Notes 4% 31mar2030, USD (W-2030)
0.96%
USA, Notes 4% 31may2030, USD (Z-2030)
0.95%
USA, Notes 4.25% 31jan2030, USD (U-2030)
0.94%
USA, Notes 3.875% 30jun2030, USD (AA-2030)
0.94%
BAMB
USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033)
3.89%
USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2033, USD (E-2033)
3.34%
USA, Notes 3.375% 15may2033, USD (C-2033)
2.62%
USA, Notes 3.5% 15feb2033, USD (B-2033)
2.46%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15nov2032, USD (F-2032)
2.21%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15feb2036, USD (B-2036)
2.20%
USA, Notes 2.875% 15may2032, USD (C-2032)
2.16%
USA, Notes 1.875% 15feb2032, USD (B-2032)
2.16%
USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2036, USD (C-2036)
2.11%
USA, Notes 4.625% 15feb2035, USD (B-2035)
2.09%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15nov2034, USD (F-2034)
2.09%
USA, Notes 2.75% 15aug2032, USD (E-2032)
2.06%
USA, Notes 4% 15nov2035, USD (F-2035)
2.06%
USA, Notes 4.375% 15may2034, USD (C-2034)
2.02%
USA, Notes 4.25% 15may2035, USD (C-2035)
2.00%
Frequently asked questions about LDRT and BAMB
How have the LDRT and BAMB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, LDRT is up 0.32% year-to-date (YTD), while BAMB has lost -2.92%. That puts LDRT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LDRT or BAMB?
Year-to-date, the LDRT ETF saw +$237M in flows, compared to -$8M for BAMB.
Which ETF is more volatile: LDRT or BAMB?
Over the past year, LDRT had a volatility of 1.59%, while BAMB experienced 3.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: LDRT or BAMB?
As of October 16, 2026, LDRT holds $264.39 M in assets under management (AUM), while BAMB manages $54.35 M.
What sectors do the LDRT and BAMB ETFs invest in?
LDRT leans toward sectors like Sovereign. Meanwhile, BAMB focuses on Sovereign.
What are the top holdings of the LDRT ETF and BAMB ETF?
LDRT top holdings include USA, Notes 4% 28feb2030, USD (H-2030), USA, Notes 1.25% 15aug2031, USD (E-2031) and USA, Notes 1.375% 15nov2031, USD (F-2031). BAMB holds in its top three: USA, Notes 4.5% 15nov2033, USD (F-2033), USA, Notes 3.875% 15aug2033, USD (E-2033) and USA, Notes 3.375% 15may2033, USD (C-2033).
Which ETF is more diversified: LDRT or BAMB?
LDRT holds 184 securities with 16.91% of its assets in the top 15. BAMB has 102 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.47%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
