LDEMvsPXHETF Comparison
VS
iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. LDEM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, PXH's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Non-Energy Materials. LDEM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.16%, versus 0.47% for PXH. LDEM is up 0.72% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. PXH performs better with 16.96% YTD performance, and +$44M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LDEM and PXH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LDEM vs PXH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LDEM PXH | -3.44%+0.93% | -1.67%+4.57% | +0.72%+16.96% | +1.24%+20.41% | +49.28%+85.64% | +8.46%+60.51% |
| Flows | LDEM PXH | --$38M | -+$63M | -+$44M | -+$125M | -$25M+$144M | -$771M+$184M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LDEM PXH | +16.02%+11.04% | +17.92%+14.25% | +15.71%+14.95% | +17.02%+15.44% |
| Max drawdown | LDEM PXH | -6.97%-2.74% | -12.07%-9.49% | -14.33%-16.17% | -36.76%-29.08% |
| Max drawdown duration | LDEM PXH | 24d39d | 233d68d | 219d218d | 1392d822d |
Trading data
LDEM | PXH | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $58.30 | $29.33 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $59.16 | $29.56 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LDEM | PXH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LDEM | PXH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $58.30 | $29.33 |
| 1D performance | -1.45% | -0.78% |
| AuM | $32.06 M | $2.03 B |
| E/R | 0.16% | 0.47% |
Characteristics
LDEM | PXH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index | RAFI Fundamental Select Emerging Markets 350 Index |
| N° of holdings | 403 | 359 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 5, 2020 | September 27, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LDEM
China
28.62%
Republic of Korea
16.01%
Taiwan
15.86%
India
9.97%
Other
29.54%
PXH
China
31.48%
Taiwan
26.65%
Brazil
10.74%
India
9.19%
Other
21.93%
Sectors
LDEM
Finance
29.27%
Technology
26.62%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.24%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.08%
Other
27.79%
PXH
Finance
28.41%
Technology
24.9%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.95%
Energy
11.76%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.24%
Other
15.73%
Advertisement
Diversification
LDEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.84%
PXH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
LDEM
SK hynix, Inc.
5.55%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.12%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
4.94%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
4.48%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
2.37%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.11%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.60%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
1.45%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.30%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
1.23%
Meituan
1.05%
United Microelectronics Corp.
0.96%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
0.91%
NetEase, Inc.
0.89%
KB Financial Group, Inc.
0.88%
PXH
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
6.32%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
4.00%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
3.12%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
2.66%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.65%
Vale SA
2.29%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.06%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.92%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.91%
JD.com, Inc.
1.58%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.45%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.36%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
1.04%
Nan Ya Plastics Corp.
1.01%
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
0.96%
Frequently asked questions about LDEM and PXH
How have the LDEM and PXH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, LDEM is up 0.72% year-to-date (YTD), while PXH has returned 16.96%. That puts PXH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LDEM or PXH?
Year-to-date, the LDEM ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$44M for PXH.
Which ETF is more volatile: LDEM or PXH?
Over the past year, LDEM had a volatility of 17.92%, while PXH experienced 14.25%.
Which ETF is bigger: LDEM or PXH?
As of October 16, 2026, LDEM holds $32.06 M in assets under management (AUM), while PXH manages $2.03 B.
What sectors do the LDEM and PXH ETFs invest in?
LDEM leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, PXH focuses on Finance, Technology and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the LDEM ETF and PXH ETF?
LDEM top holdings include SK hynix, Inc., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Tencent Holdings Ltd.. PXH holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Petróleo Brasileiro SA and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: LDEM or PXH?
LDEM holds 426 securities with 34.84% of its assets in the top 15. PXH has 359 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.33%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
