LDEMvsPXHETF Comparison
VS
iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and Invesco RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. LDEM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, PXH's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Energy. LDEM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.16%, versus 0.47% for PXH. LDEM is up 6.14% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. PXH performs better with 17.93% YTD performance, and +$66M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LDEM and PXH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LDEM vs PXH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LDEM PXH | +1.92%+2.87% | -2.15%+0.78% | +6.14%+17.93% | +13.58%+28.55% | +52.12%+83.35% | +13.25%+63.30% |
| Flows | LDEM PXH | -+$69M | -+$44M | -+$66M | -+$152M | -$29M+$96M | -$765M+$159M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LDEM PXH | +22.46%+14.55% | +17.72%+14.54% | +15.58%+15.00% | +17.01%+15.49% |
| Max drawdown | LDEM PXH | -8.60%-7.04% | -12.07%-9.49% | -14.33%-16.17% | -37.45%-29.08% |
| Max drawdown duration | LDEM PXH | 92d90d | 189d68d | 219d218d | 1462d822d |
Trading data
LDEM | PXH | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.46 | $29.98 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $61.20 | $29.80 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LDEM | PXH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LDEM | PXH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.46 | $29.98 |
| 1D performance | +0.43% | +0.60% |
| AuM | $33.78 M | $2.09 B |
| E/R | 0.16% | 0.47% |
Characteristics
LDEM | PXH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index | RAFI Fundamental Select Emerging Markets 350 Index |
| N° of holdings | 407 | 358 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 5, 2020 | September 27, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LDEM
China
30.77%
Taiwan
14.53%
Republic of Korea
12.74%
India
10.6%
Other
31.35%
PXH
China
33.57%
Taiwan
23.78%
Brazil
11.28%
India
9.66%
Other
21.7%
Sectors
LDEM
Finance
30.42%
Technology
23.98%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.62%
Other
35.98%
PXH
Finance
29.43%
Technology
23.18%
Energy
11.99%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.22%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.54%
Other
16.64%
Advertisement
Diversification
LDEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.39%
PXH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LDEM
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
5.19%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.90%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
4.25%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.04%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.22%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
2.05%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.82%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.41%
Meituan
1.32%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
1.14%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.09%
NetEase, Inc.
1.02%
Itaú Unibanco Holding SA
1.01%
BYD Co., Ltd.
0.99%
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.
0.95%
PXH
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.85%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
4.15%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
3.21%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.81%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
2.51%
Vale SA
2.29%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.23%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.02%
JD.com, Inc.
1.87%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.57%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.51%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.44%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
1.09%
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.
0.95%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.92%
Frequently asked questions about LDEM and PXH
How have the LDEM and PXH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, LDEM is up 6.14% year-to-date (YTD), while PXH has returned 17.93%. That puts PXH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LDEM or PXH?
Year-to-date, the LDEM ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$66M for PXH.
Which ETF is more volatile: LDEM or PXH?
Over the past year, LDEM had a volatility of 17.72%, while PXH experienced 14.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: LDEM or PXH?
As of September 2, 2026, LDEM holds $33.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while PXH manages $2.09 B.
What sectors do the LDEM and PXH ETFs invest in?
LDEM leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, PXH focuses on Finance, Technology and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the LDEM ETF and PXH ETF?
LDEM top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. PXH holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Petróleo Brasileiro SA and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: LDEM or PXH?
LDEM holds 431 securities with 33.39% of its assets in the top 15. PXH has 358 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.41%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
