LDEMvsEMXFETF Comparison
VS
iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. LDEM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, EMXF's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. Both LDEM and EMXF have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.16%. LDEM is up 6.14% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. EMXF performs better with 24.91% YTD performance, and +$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LDEM and EMXF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LDEM vs EMXF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LDEM EMXF | +1.92%+2.86% | -2.15%-1.35% | +6.14%+24.91% | +13.58%+37.58% | +52.12%+79.05% | +13.25%+45.14% |
| Flows | LDEM EMXF | -- | -+$6M | -+$15M | -+$20M | -$29M+$53M | -$765M+$103M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LDEM EMXF | +22.46%+24.12% | +17.72%+19.53% | +15.58%+16.01% | +17.01%+16.97% |
| Max drawdown | LDEM EMXF | -8.60%-10.85% | -12.07%-12.39% | -14.33%-14.71% | -37.45%-31.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | LDEM EMXF | 92d72d | 189d50d | 219d219d | 1462d1368d |
Trading data
LDEM | EMXF | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.46 | $57.65 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $61.20 | $57.37 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LDEM | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LDEM | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.46 | $57.65 |
| 1D performance | +0.43% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $33.78 M | $166.35 M |
| E/R | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Characteristics
LDEM | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index | MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 407 | 543 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 5, 2020 | October 6, 2020 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LDEM
China
30.77%
Taiwan
14.53%
Republic of Korea
12.74%
India
10.6%
Other
31.35%
EMXF
China
26.1%
Taiwan
22.16%
Republic of Korea
11.43%
India
11.1%
Other
29.22%
Sectors
LDEM
Finance
30.42%
Technology
23.98%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.62%
Other
35.98%
EMXF
Finance
41.83%
Technology
31.44%
Other
26.73%
Advertisement
Diversification
LDEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.39%
EMXF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LDEM
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
5.19%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.90%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
4.25%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.04%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.22%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
2.05%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.82%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.41%
Meituan
1.32%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
1.14%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.09%
NetEase, Inc.
1.02%
Itaú Unibanco Holding SA
1.01%
BYD Co., Ltd.
0.99%
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.
0.95%
EMXF
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
5.12%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.87%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.98%
MediaTek, Inc.
2.70%
China Construction Bank Corp.
1.89%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.73%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
1.68%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.28%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
1.19%
Meituan
1.11%
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.99%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
0.97%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
0.96%
Al Rajhi Bank
0.92%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
0.92%
Frequently asked questions about LDEM and EMXF
How have the LDEM and EMXF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, LDEM is up 6.14% year-to-date (YTD), while EMXF has returned 24.91%. That puts EMXF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LDEM or EMXF?
Year-to-date, the LDEM ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$15M for EMXF.
Which ETF is more volatile: LDEM or EMXF?
Over the past year, LDEM had a volatility of 17.72%, while EMXF experienced 19.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: LDEM or EMXF?
As of September 2, 2026, LDEM holds $33.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while EMXF manages $166.35 M.
What sectors do the LDEM and EMXF ETFs invest in?
LDEM leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, EMXF focuses on Finance and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LDEM ETF and EMXF ETF?
LDEM top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. EMXF holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LDEM or EMXF?
LDEM holds 431 securities with 33.39% of its assets in the top 15. EMXF has 574 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.32%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
