Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LCTUvsVTHRETF Comparison
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. LCTU is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.06% for VTHR. LCTU is down -3.74% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. VTHR performs better with -2.74% YTD performance, and +$23M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LCTU and VTHR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LCTU vs VTHR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LCTU VTHR | -3.03%-3.14% | -3.55%-2.47% | -3.74%-2.74% | +20.45%+21.56% | +74.20%+76.09% | n/a+67.77% |
| Flows | LCTU VTHR | -$33M-$68M | -$17M+$204M | -$20M+$23M | -$15M+$345M | -$639M+$1.15B | -+$1.83B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LCTU VTHR | +12.18%+12.02% | +18.57%+18.46% | +15.11%+15.06% | n/a+17.45% |
| Max drawdown | LCTU VTHR | -5.49%-4.98% | -14.18%-14.04% | -19.80%-19.31% | n/a-25.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | LCTU VTHR | 60d45d | 45d45d | 127d127d | n/a711d |
LCTU | VTHR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.25 | $292.23 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $71.70 | $293.82 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LCTU | VTHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LCTU | VTHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.25 | $292.23 |
| 1D performance | -0.63% | -0.54% |
| AuM | $1.34 B | $3.92 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.06% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LCTU and VTHR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, LCTU is down -3.74% year-to-date (YTD), while VTHR has lost -2.74%. That puts VTHR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LCTU or VTHR?
Year-to-date, the LCTU ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to +$23M for VTHR.
Which ETF is more volatile: LCTU or VTHR?
Over the past year, LCTU had a volatility of 18.57%, while VTHR experienced 18.46%.
Which ETF is bigger: LCTU or VTHR?
As of March 13, 2026, LCTU holds $1.34 B in assets under management (AUM), while VTHR manages $3.92 B.
What sectors do the LCTU and VTHR ETFs invest in?
LCTU leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, VTHR focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the LCTU ETF and VTHR ETF?
LCTU top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. VTHR holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: LCTU or VTHR?
LCTU holds 302 securities with 41.05% of its assets in the top 15. VTHR has 2928 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.68%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
