Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LCTUvsIWVETF Comparison
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. LCTU is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.2% for IWV. LCTU is down -3.74% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. IWV performs better with -2.77% YTD performance, and -$547M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LCTU and IWV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LCTU vs IWV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LCTU IWV | -3.03%-3.15% | -3.55%-2.50% | -3.74%-2.77% | +20.45%+21.42% | +74.20%+75.56% | n/a+67.06% |
| Flows | LCTU IWV | -$33M-$608M | -$17M-$509M | -$20M-$547M | -$15M+$105M | -$639M+$77M | --$58M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LCTU IWV | +12.18%+12.35% | +18.57%+18.52% | +15.11%+15.15% | n/a+17.27% |
| Max drawdown | LCTU IWV | -5.49%-4.99% | -14.18%-14.04% | -19.80%-19.32% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | LCTU IWV | 60d45d | 45d45d | 127d127d | n/a711d |
LCTU | IWV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.25 | $376.11 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $71.70 | $378.23 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LCTU | IWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LCTU | IWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.25 | $376.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.63% | -0.56% |
| AuM | $1.34 B | $17.26 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.2% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LCTU and IWV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, LCTU is down -3.74% year-to-date (YTD), while IWV has lost -2.77%. That puts IWV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LCTU or IWV?
Year-to-date, the LCTU ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to -$547M for IWV.
Which ETF is more volatile: LCTU or IWV?
Over the past year, LCTU had a volatility of 18.57%, while IWV experienced 18.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: LCTU or IWV?
As of March 13, 2026, LCTU holds $1.34 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWV manages $17.26 B.
What sectors do the LCTU and IWV ETFs invest in?
LCTU leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWV focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the LCTU ETF and IWV ETF?
LCTU top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWV holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: LCTU or IWV?
LCTU holds 302 securities with 41.05% of its assets in the top 15. IWV has 2588 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.69%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
