New

Explore professionally built ETF model portfolios. Discover now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

LCTUvsIWBETF Comparison

ETF 1
LCTU

BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF

VS
ETF 2
IWB

iShares Russell 1000 ETF

This fund is part of
US Large Cap
-0.42%

BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) belongs to the segment. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. LCTU is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.15% for IWB. LCTU is up 3.64% year-to-date (YTD) with -$27M in YTD flows. IWB performs better with 5.02% YTD performance, and -$2.27B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LCTU and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

LCTU vs IWB performance and flow charts

Performance

024681012%Mar 27Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27

Cumulative Flows

-1,000 M-800 M-600 M-400 M-200 M0 MMar 27Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
LCTU
IWB
+11.98%+12.40%
+2.09%+2.84%
+3.64%+5.02%
+29.43%+30.61%
+75.35%+79.32%
+72.86%+76.23%
Flows
LCTU
IWB
-$2M-$901M
-$33M-$1.86B
-$27M-$2.27B
-$15M-$2.37B
-$685M-$2.76B
-$534M-$1.91B
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
LCTU
IWB
+15.60%+15.61%
+12.80%+12.66%
+15.21%+15.12%
+17.31%+17.24%
Max drawdown
LCTU
IWB
-9.07%-8.86%
-9.37%-8.86%
-19.80%-19.16%
-25.94%-25.17%
Max drawdown duration
LCTU
IWB
77d76d
93d76d
127d126d
744d709d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
LCTU
IWB
Last sale
4/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
$76.02
$388.87
Previous close
04/28/2026
$76.18
$389.07
Consolidated volume
04/28/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

LCTU
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
LCTU
IWB
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LCTU
IWB
Last price
$76.02
$388.87
1D performance
-0.22%
-0.05%
AuM$1.44 B$46.06 B
E/R0.3%0.15%
Characteristics
LCTU
IWB
Management strategyActivePassive
ProvideriSharesiShares
Benchmark-Russell 1000 Index
N° of holdings288911
Asset class-Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateApril 8, 2021May 15, 2000
ESGYesNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

LCTU
USA
96.34%
Other
3.66%
IWB
USA
96.58%
Other
3.42%

Sectors

LCTU
Information Techn.
32.54%
Financials
11.03%
Consumer Discreti.
10.13%
Health Care
9.61%
Communication Ser.
9.56%
Industrials
8.48%
Other
18.65%
IWB
Information Techn.
32.18%
Financials
10.63%
Consumer Discreti.
10.06%
Communication Ser.
9.9%
Health Care
9.46%
Industrials
8.89%
Other
18.89%
Advertisement

Diversification

LCTU

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

39.16%
IWB

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

39.26%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of March 31, 2026
LCTU
NVIDIA
7.31%
APPLE
7.12%
MICROSOFT-T
3.65%
AMAZON.COM INC
2.78%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.47%
META PLATFORMS
2.35%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.19%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.94%
TESLA
1.80%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.46%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.28%
BK OF AMERICA CO
1.25%
LILLY
1.23%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
1.22%
ECOLAB
1.10%
IWB
NVIDIA
6.82%
APPLE
6.11%
MICROSOFT-T
4.59%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.34%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.79%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.39%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.27%
META PLATFORMS
2.09%
TESLA
1.75%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.48%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.33%
LILLY
1.23%
EXXON
1.20%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
0.98%
WALMART INC
0.90%
Frequently asked questions about LCTU and IWB

How have the LCTU and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 27, 2026, LCTU is up 3.64% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 5.02%. That puts IWB better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LCTU or IWB?

Year-to-date, the LCTU ETF saw -$27M in flows, compared to -$2.27B for IWB.

Which ETF is more volatile: LCTU or IWB?

Over the past year, LCTU had a volatility of 12.8%, while IWB experienced 12.66%.

Which ETF is bigger: LCTU or IWB?

As of April 27, 2026, LCTU holds $1.44 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $46.06 B.

What sectors do the LCTU and IWB ETFs invest in?

LCTU leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.

What are the top holdings of the LCTU ETF and IWB ETF?

LCTU top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.

Which ETF is more diversified: LCTU or IWB?

LCTU holds 308 securities with 39.16% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1006 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.26%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up