Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LCTUvsIWBETF Comparison
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. LCTU's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, IWB's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. LCTU is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.15% for IWB. LCTU is down -3.74% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. IWB performs better with -2.89% YTD performance, and +$172M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LCTU and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LCTU vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LCTU IWB | -3.03%-3.00% | -3.55%-2.53% | -3.74%-2.89% | +20.45%+21.27% | +74.20%+77.49% | n/a+71.72% |
| Flows | LCTU IWB | -$33M+$404M | -$17M+$543M | -$20M+$172M | -$15M+$1.39B | -$639M-$464M | -+$662M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LCTU IWB | +12.18%+12.20% | +18.57%+18.43% | +15.11%+15.02% | n/a+17.13% |
| Max drawdown | LCTU IWB | -5.49%-4.90% | -14.18%-13.95% | -19.80%-19.16% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | LCTU IWB | 60d45d | 45d45d | 127d126d | n/a709d |
LCTU | IWB | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.25 | $362.62 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $71.70 | $364.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LCTU | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LCTU | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.25 | $362.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.63% | -0.54% |
| AuM | $1.34 B | $45.12 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LCTU and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, LCTU is down -3.74% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has lost -2.89%. That puts IWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LCTU or IWB?
Year-to-date, the LCTU ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to +$172M for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: LCTU or IWB?
Over the past year, LCTU had a volatility of 18.57%, while IWB experienced 18.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: LCTU or IWB?
As of March 13, 2026, LCTU holds $1.34 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $45.12 B.
What sectors do the LCTU and IWB ETFs invest in?
LCTU leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the LCTU ETF and IWB ETF?
LCTU top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWB holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: LCTU or IWB?
LCTU holds 302 securities with 41.05% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1008 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.55%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
