LCOWvsQLTYETF Comparison
VS
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) and GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. LCOW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.5% for QLTY. LCOW is up 1.63% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. QLTY performs better with 3.85% YTD performance, and +$978M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LCOW and QLTY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LCOW vs QLTY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LCOW QLTY | +7.81%+8.97% | +3.07%+1.05% | +1.63%+3.85% | +22.21%+29.75% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | LCOW QLTY | +$5M+$200M | +$6M+$784M | +$7M+$978M | +$21M+$1.81B | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LCOW QLTY | +15.02%+15.54% | +12.49%+13.00% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | LCOW QLTY | -9.34%-10.69% | -10.34%-11.64% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LCOW QLTY | 66d73d | 91d109d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
LCOW | QLTY | |
Last sale 5/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.30 | $39.94 |
| Previous close 05/05/2026 | $24.15 | $39.66 |
| Consolidated volume 05/05/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QLTY
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLCOW | QLTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/5/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LCOW | QLTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.30 | $39.94 |
| 1D performance | +0.62% | +0.71% |
| AuM | $23.06 M | $4.16 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
LCOW | QLTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | GMO |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 38 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 6, 2025 | November 13, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LCOW
USA
99.14%
Other
0.86%
QLTY
USA
94.9%
Other
5.1%
Sectors
LCOW
Information Techn.
45.7%
Health Care
16.67%
Communication Ser.
10.38%
Financials
7.46%
Consumer Staples
7.44%
Other
12.35%
QLTY
Information Techn.
33.5%
Health Care
24.3%
Communication Ser.
10.9%
Consumer Discreti.
10.2%
Consumer Staples
8.9%
Other
12.2%
Diversification
LCOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.69%
QLTY
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.7%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
LCOW
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.99%
APPLE
5.14%
NVIDIA
4.70%
MASTERCARD
4.61%
VISA INCORPORATION
4.59%
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.57%
ABBVIE
4.27%
META PLATFORMS
4.02%
MICROSOFT-T
3.68%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
3.65%
PHILLIP MORRIS
3.16%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
1.98%
PROCTERGAMBLE
1.87%
CISCO-T
1.81%
US5128073062
1.65%
QLTY
MICROSOFT-T
6.20%
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.30%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
5.20%
APPLE
4.80%
META PLATFORMS
4.50%
US5128073062
4.40%
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.20%
KLA CORPORATION
3.50%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.40%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
3.40%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
3.20%
ABBOTT LABS
3.10%
HILTON INC
2.90%
ACCENTURE PLC-A
2.80%
SALESFORCE INC
2.80%
Frequently asked questions about LCOW and QLTY
How have the LCOW and QLTY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 5, 2026, LCOW is up 1.63% year-to-date (YTD), while QLTY has returned 3.85%. That puts QLTY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LCOW or QLTY?
Year-to-date, the LCOW ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$978M for QLTY.
Which ETF is more volatile: LCOW or QLTY?
Over the past year, LCOW had a volatility of 12.49%, while QLTY experienced 13%.
Which ETF is bigger: LCOW or QLTY?
As of May 5, 2026, LCOW holds $23.06 M in assets under management (AUM), while QLTY manages $4.16 B.
What sectors do the LCOW and QLTY ETFs invest in?
LCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. Meanwhile, QLTY focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the LCOW ETF and QLTY ETF?
LCOW top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, APPLE and NVIDIA. QLTY holds in its top three: MICROSOFT-T, ALPHABET INC-CL and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: LCOW or QLTY?
LCOW holds 100 securities with 55.69% of its assets in the top 15. QLTY has 38 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.7%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LCOW & QLTY
Advertisement
