Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LCOWvsNANCETF Comparison
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF -USD
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF -USD (NANC) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. LCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. In contrast, NANC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. LCOW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.74% for NANC. LCOW is down -2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. NANC performs worse with -3.03% YTD performance, and -$2K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LCOW and NANC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LCOW vs NANC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LCOW NANC | -1.88%-2.34% | -2.28%-3.94% | -2.00%-3.03% | n/a+23.39% | n/a+90.58% | n/an/a |
| Flows | LCOW NANC | +$589K- | +$1M-$2K | +$1M-$2K | --$6M | -+$200M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LCOW NANC | +11.94%+13.28% | n/a+19.40% | n/a+16.78% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | LCOW NANC | -3.84%-5.94% | n/a-13.93% | n/a-21.04% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LCOW NANC | 36d41d | n/a43d | n/a124d | n/an/a |
LCOW | NANC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.29 | $44.14 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $23.39 | $44.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LCOW | NANC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LCOW | NANC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.29 | $44.14 |
| 1D performance | -0.41% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $16.97 M | $255.48 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.74% |
LCOW | NANC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Subversive Capital |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 6, 2025 | February 7, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LCOW and NANC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, LCOW is down -2% year-to-date (YTD), while NANC has lost -3.03%. That puts LCOW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LCOW or NANC?
Year-to-date, the LCOW ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to -$2K for NANC.
Which ETF is bigger: LCOW or NANC?
As of March 10, 2026, LCOW holds $16.97 M in assets under management (AUM), while NANC manages $255.48 M.
What sectors do the LCOW and NANC ETFs invest in?
LCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. Meanwhile, NANC focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the LCOW ETF and NANC ETF?
LCOW top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and APPLE. NANC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: LCOW or NANC?
LCOW holds 100 securities with 56.26% of its assets in the top 15. NANC has 103 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.14%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
