Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LCOWvsLGHETF Comparison
HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index ETF (LGH) is part of the segment. LCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. In contrast, LGH's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. LCOW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 1% for LGH. LCOW is down -4.5% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. LGH performs better with -2.44% YTD performance, and -$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LCOW and LGH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LCOW vs LGH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LCOW LGH | -2.94%-3.22% | -4.16%-3.58% | -4.50%-2.44% | n/a+25.08% | n/a+84.57% | n/a+76.39% |
| Flows | LCOW LGH | +$589K-$6M | +$1M-$9M | +$1M-$9M | -+$20M | -+$104M | -+$238M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LCOW LGH | +12.09%+16.10% | n/a+17.88% | n/a+16.87% | n/a+16.75% |
| Max drawdown | LCOW LGH | -5.84%-5.38% | n/a-11.27% | n/a-18.42% | n/a-29.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | LCOW LGH | 39d58d | n/a48d | n/a206d | n/a806d |
LCOW | LGH | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.83 | $58.68 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $22.97 | $59.21 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LCOW | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LCOW | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.83 | $58.68 |
| 1D performance | -0.62% | -0.90% |
| AuM | $16.54 M | $556.42 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 1% |
LCOW | LGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Howard Capital Management |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | HCM Retirement Defender 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 393 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 6, 2025 | October 7, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LCOW and LGH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, LCOW is down -4.5% year-to-date (YTD), while LGH has lost -2.44%. That puts LGH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LCOW or LGH?
Year-to-date, the LCOW ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to -$9M for LGH.
Which ETF is bigger: LCOW or LGH?
As of March 13, 2026, LCOW holds $16.54 M in assets under management (AUM), while LGH manages $556.42 M.
What sectors do the LCOW and LGH ETFs invest in?
LCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. Meanwhile, LGH focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the LCOW ETF and LGH ETF?
LCOW top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and APPLE. LGH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: LCOW or LGH?
LCOW holds 100 securities with 56.26% of its assets in the top 15. LGH has 405 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.6%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
