LCOWvsBAMGETF Comparison
VS
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (LCOW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Brookstone Growth Stock ETF (BAMG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. LCOW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.88% for BAMG. LCOW is up 5.2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. BAMG performs better with 11.17% YTD performance, and -$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LCOW and BAMG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LCOW vs BAMG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LCOW BAMG | +0.53%+7.12% | +11.02%+18.55% | +5.20%+11.17% | +20.63%+28.43% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | LCOW BAMG | +$1M-$882K | +$7M+$6M | +$8M-$9M | +$13M+$2M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LCOW BAMG | +14.41%+19.56% | +12.21%+15.29% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | LCOW BAMG | -4.03%-6.02% | -10.34%-13.08% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LCOW BAMG | 20d19d | 91d126d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
LCOW | BAMG | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.12 | $44.68 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $24.91 | $43.93 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BAMG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLCOW | BAMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LCOW | BAMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.12 | $44.68 |
| 1D performance | +0.85% | +1.71% |
| AuM | $25.09 M | $140.30 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.88% |
Characteristics
LCOW | BAMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Brookstone Asset Management |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 95 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 6, 2025 | September 27, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LCOW
USA
99.34%
Other
0.66%
BAMG
USA
96.49%
Other
3.51%
Sectors
LCOW
Information Techn.
50.26%
Health Care
15.22%
Communication Ser.
10.96%
Financials
7.2%
Other
16.36%
BAMG
Information Techn.
38.81%
Health Care
12.19%
Communication Ser.
11.17%
Industrials
8.5%
Consumer Staples
8.34%
Other
20.99%
Advertisement
Diversification
LCOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.64%
BAMG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.47%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
LCOW
BROADCOM LIMITED
5.73%
NVIDIA
5.72%
MICROSOFT-T
5.45%
META PLATFORMS
5.32%
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.32%
APPLE
4.97%
VISA INCORPORATION
4.82%
MASTERCARD
4.80%
ABBVIE
4.01%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
3.22%
PHILLIP MORRIS
2.69%
US5128073062
2.13%
KLA CORPORATION
1.95%
CISCO-T
1.81%
APPLIED MATERIAL
1.70%
BAMG
BROADCOM LIMITED
4.79%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.71%
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.63%
NVIDIA
4.56%
META PLATFORMS
4.32%
APPLE
4.12%
LILLY
3.68%
VISA INCORPORATION
2.76%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
2.73%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.54%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
2.12%
COSTCO WHOLESALE
2.02%
MASTERCARD
1.93%
NETFLIX
1.81%
CATERPILLAR
1.77%
Frequently asked questions about LCOW and BAMG
How have the LCOW and BAMG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, LCOW is up 5.2% year-to-date (YTD), while BAMG has returned 11.17%. That puts BAMG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LCOW or BAMG?
Year-to-date, the LCOW ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to -$9M for BAMG.
Which ETF is more volatile: LCOW or BAMG?
Over the past year, LCOW had a volatility of 12.21%, while BAMG experienced 15.29%.
Which ETF is bigger: LCOW or BAMG?
As of June 18, 2026, LCOW holds $25.09 M in assets under management (AUM), while BAMG manages $140.30 M.
What sectors do the LCOW and BAMG ETFs invest in?
LCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. Meanwhile, BAMG focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the LCOW ETF and BAMG ETF?
LCOW top holdings include BROADCOM LIMITED, NVIDIA and MICROSOFT-T. BAMG holds in its top three: BROADCOM LIMITED, AMAZON.COM INC and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: LCOW or BAMG?
LCOW holds 100 securities with 59.64% of its assets in the top 15. BAMG has 97 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.47%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
