BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

LCDSvsQVMLETF Comparison

ETF 1

LCDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF

This fund is part of

US Large Cap

-1.98%

Full LCDS fund page

VS

ETF 2

QVML

Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

-1.36%

Full QVML fund page

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. LCDS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, QVML's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. LCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.11% for QVML. LCDS is up 12.43% year-to-date (YTD) with +$34K in YTD flows. QVML performs better with 12.82% YTD performance, and +$34M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LCDS and QVML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

LCDS vs QVML performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 10/30/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	LCDS QVML	-0.47%-0.42%	+2.19%+2.32%	+12.43%+12.82%	+13.35%+13.59%	n/a+90.34%	n/a+77.84%
Flows	LCDS QVML	-+$43M	-+$198M	+$34K+$34M	+$34K+$39M	-+$221M	-+$260M

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	LCDS QVML	+9.75%+10.36%	+12.28%+12.48%	n/a+14.85%	n/a+16.60%
Max drawdown	LCDS QVML	-3.17%-3.05%	-8.97%-8.73%	n/a-18.54%	n/a-23.56%
Max drawdown duration	LCDS QVML	50d53d	76d70d	n/a127d	n/a707d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	LCDS	QVML
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM	$73.00	$44.99
Previous close 10/29/2026	$74.09	$45.74
Consolidated volume 10/29/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of October 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

LCDS

is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	LCDS	QVML
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	LCDS	QVML
Last price	$73.00	$44.99
1D performance	-1.47%	-1.64%
AuM	$16.42 M	$1.70 B
E/R	0.3%	0.11%

Characteristics

	LCDS	QVML
Management strategy	Active	Passive
Provider	J.P. Morgan Asset Management	Invesco
Benchmark	-	S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index
N° of holdings	112	436
Asset class	-	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	August 7, 2024	June 30, 2021
ESG	No	No

More LCDS data on Trackinsight

More QVML data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

LCDS

USA

95.31%

Other

4.69%

QVML

USA

97.36%

Other

2.64%

Sectors

LCDS

Technology

47.5%

Finance

13.59%

Healthcare

9.17%

Consumer Non-Cycl.

8.85%

Industrials

7.5%

Other

13.38%

QVML

Technology

46.95%

Finance

13.96%

Consumer Non-Cycl.

9.51%

Healthcare

9.42%

Industrials

7.6%

Other

12.55%

Diversification

LCDS

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

51.91%

QVML

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

47.81%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of September 30, 2026

LCDS

NVIDIA Corp.

9.02%

Apple, Inc.

7.58%

Microsoft Corp.

6.59%

Alphabet, Inc.

4.91%

Amazon.com, Inc.

4.17%

Meta Platforms, Inc.

3.10%

Micron Technology, Inc.

2.70%

Broadcom Inc.

2.33%

Wells Fargo & Co.

2.07%

ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.

1.84%

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

1.75%

Mastercard, Inc.

1.66%

AbbVie, Inc.

1.47%

Eli Lilly & Co.

1.39%

Tesla, Inc.

1.31%

QVML

NVIDIA Corp.

9.13%

Apple, Inc.

8.32%

Microsoft Corp.

6.54%

Alphabet, Inc.

4.54%

Amazon.com, Inc.

4.23%

Broadcom Inc.

2.81%

Micron Technology, Inc.

1.86%

Eli Lilly & Co.

1.62%

Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.

1.57%

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

1.52%

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

1.50%

ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.

1.11%

Visa, Inc.

1.10%

Johnson & Johnson

1.10%

Mastercard, Inc.

0.85%

Frequently asked questions about LCDS and QVML

LCDSvsQVMLETF Comparison

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF

Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF

LCDS vs QVML performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the LCDS and QVML ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 30, 2026, LCDS is up 12.43% year-to-date (YTD), while QVML has returned 12.82%. That puts QVML better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LCDS or QVML?

Year-to-date, the LCDS ETF saw +$34K in flows, compared to +$34M for QVML.

Which ETF is more volatile: LCDS or QVML?

Over the past year, LCDS had a volatility of 12.28%, while QVML experienced 12.48%.

Which ETF is bigger: LCDS or QVML?

As of October 30, 2026, LCDS holds $16.42 M in assets under management (AUM), while QVML manages $1.70 B.

What sectors do the LCDS and QVML ETFs invest in?

LCDS leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, QVML focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.

What are the top holdings of the LCDS ETF and QVML ETF?

LCDS top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. QVML holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: LCDS or QVML?

LCDS holds 112 securities with 51.91% of its assets in the top 15. QVML has 436 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.81%.

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection