LCDSvsPBPETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (PBP) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. LCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.29% for PBP. LCDS is up 11.44% year-to-date (YTD) with +$34K in YTD flows. PBP performs worse with 9.16% YTD performance, and +$46M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LCDS and PBP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LCDS vs PBP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LCDS PBP | -2.62%-0.10% | +1.36%+3.47% | +11.44%+9.16% | +16.09%+16.90% | n/a+44.00% | n/a+45.69% |
| Flows | LCDS PBP | -+$14M | +$34K+$33M | +$34K+$46M | -$4K+$72M | -+$275M | -+$205M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LCDS PBP | +10.71%+5.62% | +12.45%+7.24% | n/a+10.33% | n/a+11.36% |
| Max drawdown | LCDS PBP | -3.17%-1.21% | -8.97%-5.24% | n/a-15.51% | n/a-18.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | LCDS PBP | 31d9d | 76d63d | n/a240d | n/a679d |
Trading data
LCDS | PBP | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.51 | $23.39 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $72.92 | $23.15 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLCDS | PBP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LCDS | PBP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.51 | $23.39 |
| 1D performance | -0.56% | +1.04% |
| AuM | $16.32 M | $381.32 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.29% |
Characteristics
LCDS | PBP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 112 | 500 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | December 20, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LCDS
USA
95.22%
Other
4.78%
PBP
USA
98.14%
Other
1.86%
Sectors
LCDS
Technology
43.87%
Finance
14.87%
Healthcare
9.48%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.19%
Industrials
8.44%
Other
14.15%
PBP
Technology
44.19%
Finance
14.31%
Healthcare
9.37%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.14%
Industrials
7.9%
Other
15.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
LCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.22%
PBP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.4%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LCDS
NVIDIA Corp.
8.21%
Apple, Inc.
7.80%
Microsoft Corp.
5.18%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.86%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.02%
Broadcom Inc.
2.64%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.55%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.34%
Wells Fargo & Co.
2.27%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.85%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.68%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.49%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.46%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.43%
Bank of America Corp.
1.43%
PBP
Apple, Inc.
7.95%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.36%
Microsoft Corp.
4.64%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
2.80%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.54%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.06%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.53%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.49%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.48%
Tesla, Inc.
1.34%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.33%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.12%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.04%
Frequently asked questions about LCDS and PBP
How have the LCDS and PBP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, LCDS is up 11.44% year-to-date (YTD), while PBP has returned 9.16%. That puts LCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LCDS or PBP?
Year-to-date, the LCDS ETF saw +$34K in flows, compared to +$46M for PBP.
Which ETF is more volatile: LCDS or PBP?
Over the past year, LCDS had a volatility of 12.45%, while PBP experienced 7.24%.
Which ETF is bigger: LCDS or PBP?
As of September 16, 2026, LCDS holds $16.32 M in assets under management (AUM), while PBP manages $381.32 M.
What sectors do the LCDS and PBP ETFs invest in?
LCDS leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, PBP focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the LCDS ETF and PBP ETF?
LCDS top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. PBP holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: LCDS or PBP?
LCDS holds 112 securities with 49.22% of its assets in the top 15. PBP has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.4%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LCDS & PBP
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
PBP
Options Strategies in ETFs, Part 1: A Grand Overview
November 1, 2023
PBP
Advertisement
Advertisement
