LCDSvsBWVTFETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. iPath CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index ETN (BWVTF) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. LCDS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.75% for BWVTF. LCDS is up 12.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$34K in YTD flows. BWVTF performs worse with 10.9% YTD performance, and -$126K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LCDS and BWVTF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LCDS vs BWVTF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LCDS BWVTF | -1.54%+1.07% | +3.66%+5.13% | +12.68%+10.90% | +17.49%+19.21% | n/a+48.44% | n/a+50.21% |
| Flows | LCDS BWVTF | -- | +$34K- | +$34K-$126K | -$4K-$841K | --$841K | --$1M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LCDS BWVTF | +10.66%+6.33% | +12.49%+7.69% | n/a+11.17% | n/a+12.33% |
| Max drawdown | LCDS BWVTF | -3.17%-1.30% | -8.97%-5.71% | n/a-16.79% | n/a-19.88% |
| Max drawdown duration | LCDS BWVTF | 32d8d | 76d62d | n/a240d | n/a686d |
Trading data
LCDS | BWVTF | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.29 | |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $73.34 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLCDS | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LCDS | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.29 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | – |
| AuM | $16.50 M | $1.57 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
LCDS | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Barclays |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 112 | 500 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | May 22, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LCDS
USA
95.22%
Other
4.78%
BWVTF
USA
98.14%
Other
1.86%
Sectors
LCDS
Technology
43.87%
Finance
14.87%
Healthcare
9.48%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.19%
Industrials
8.44%
Other
14.15%
BWVTF
Technology
44.19%
Finance
14.31%
Healthcare
9.37%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.14%
Industrials
7.9%
Other
15.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
LCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.22%
BWVTF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.4%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LCDS
NVIDIA Corp.
8.21%
Apple, Inc.
7.80%
Microsoft Corp.
5.18%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.86%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.02%
Broadcom Inc.
2.64%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.55%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.34%
Wells Fargo & Co.
2.27%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.85%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.68%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.49%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.46%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.43%
Bank of America Corp.
1.43%
BWVTF
Apple, Inc.
7.95%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.36%
Microsoft Corp.
4.64%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Broadcom Inc.
2.80%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.54%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.06%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.53%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.49%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.48%
Tesla, Inc.
1.34%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.33%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.12%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.04%
Frequently asked questions about LCDS and BWVTF
How have the LCDS and BWVTF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, LCDS is up 12.68% year-to-date (YTD), while BWVTF has returned 10.9%. That puts LCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LCDS or BWVTF?
Year-to-date, the LCDS ETF saw +$34K in flows, compared to -$126K for BWVTF.
Which ETF is more volatile: LCDS or BWVTF?
Over the past year, LCDS had a volatility of 12.49%, while BWVTF experienced 7.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: LCDS or BWVTF?
As of September 17, 2026, LCDS holds $16.50 M in assets under management (AUM), while BWVTF manages $1.57 M.
What sectors do the LCDS and BWVTF ETFs invest in?
LCDS leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, BWVTF focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the LCDS ETF and BWVTF ETF?
LCDS top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. BWVTF holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: LCDS or BWVTF?
LCDS holds 112 securities with 49.22% of its assets in the top 15. BWVTF has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.4%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
