LBAYvsLQDHETF Comparison
VS
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. LBAY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.2%, versus 0.44% for LQDH. LBAY is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7M in YTD flows. LQDH performs worse with 3.44% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LBAY and LQDH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LBAY vs LQDH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LBAY LQDH | +2.03%+0.06% | +5.38%+1.26% | +14.97%+3.44% | +14.59%+5.09% | +20.15%+23.19% | +36.89%+29.42% |
| Flows | LBAY LQDH | -$667K+$28M | -$1M+$97M | -$7M+$27M | -$8M+$88M | -$47M+$346M | +$18M+$6M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LBAY LQDH | +17.23%+1.91% | +17.87%+2.55% | +14.45%+3.30% | +14.10%+4.31% |
| Max drawdown | LBAY LQDH | -12.62%-0.60% | -13.57%-2.26% | -14.73%-4.48% | -16.53%-6.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | LBAY LQDH | 53d24d | 179d82d | 470d104d | 1122d437d |
Trading data
LBAY | LQDH | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 6:25 PM | $26.84 | $92.30 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $27.06 | $92.36 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LBAY
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLBAY | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 6:25 PM
Live
Closed
LBAY | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.84 | $92.30 |
| 1D performance | -0.81% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $17.60 M | $600.46 M |
| E/R | 1.2% | 0.44% |
Characteristics
LBAY | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Leatherback Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 16, 2020 | May 27, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LBAY
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Sectors
LBAY
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Diversification
LBAY
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
LBAY
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about LBAY and LQDH
How have the LBAY and LQDH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, LBAY is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD), while LQDH has returned 3.44%. That puts LBAY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LBAY or LQDH?
Year-to-date, the LBAY ETF saw -$7M in flows, compared to +$27M for LQDH.
Which ETF is more volatile: LBAY or LQDH?
Over the past year, LBAY had a volatility of 17.87%, while LQDH experienced 2.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: LBAY or LQDH?
As of October 16, 2026, LBAY holds $17.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while LQDH manages $600.46 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
