LBAYvsFTLSETF Comparison
VS
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. LBAY is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.2%, versus 1.38% for FTLS. LBAY is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7M in YTD flows. FTLS performs worse with 9.5% YTD performance, and +$289M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LBAY and FTLS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LBAY vs FTLS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LBAY FTLS | +2.03%+1.75% | +5.38%+3.63% | +14.97%+9.50% | +14.59%+13.00% | +20.15%+49.71% | +36.89%+65.37% |
| Flows | LBAY FTLS | -$667K+$77M | -$1M+$107M | -$7M+$289M | -$8M+$398M | -$47M+$1.32B | +$18M+$1.61B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LBAY FTLS | +17.23%+5.74% | +17.87%+7.14% | +14.45%+8.66% | +14.10%+9.37% |
| Max drawdown | LBAY FTLS | -12.62%-1.19% | -13.57%-3.80% | -14.73%-11.43% | -16.53%-11.43% |
| Max drawdown duration | LBAY FTLS | 53d15d | 179d65d | 470d214d | 1122d214d |
Trading data
LBAY | FTLS | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.06 | $76.86 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $26.47 | $77.23 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LBAY | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.06 | $76.86 |
| 1D performance | +2.21% | -0.48% |
| AuM | $17.60 M | $2.65 B |
| E/R | 1.2% | 1.38% |
Characteristics
LBAY | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Leatherback Asset Management | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 16, 2020 | September 8, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LBAY
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Sectors
LBAY
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
LBAY
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
LBAY
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about LBAY and FTLS
How have the LBAY and FTLS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, LBAY is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD), while FTLS has returned 9.5%. That puts LBAY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LBAY or FTLS?
Year-to-date, the LBAY ETF saw -$7M in flows, compared to +$289M for FTLS.
Which ETF is more volatile: LBAY or FTLS?
Over the past year, LBAY had a volatility of 17.87%, while FTLS experienced 7.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: LBAY or FTLS?
As of October 16, 2026, LBAY holds $17.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while FTLS manages $2.65 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
