KUREvsFLCHETF Comparison
ETF 1
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
+0.69%
VS
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. KURE's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, FLCH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. KURE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.19% for FLCH. KURE is up 0.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. FLCH performs worse with -7.68% YTD performance, and +$48M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KURE and FLCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KURE vs FLCH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KURE FLCH | +9.84%+7.25% | -0.46%-3.34% | +0.17%-7.68% | -10.50%-2.72% | -4.22%+22.28% | -47.23%-10.66% |
| Flows | KURE FLCH | +$21M+$34M | +$17M+$30M | +$22M+$48M | -$896K+$105M | +$22M+$164M | -$25M+$201M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KURE FLCH | +31.73%+21.47% | +27.53%+19.90% | +26.47%+23.41% | +27.48%+26.68% |
| Max drawdown | KURE FLCH | -16.96%-14.72% | -29.89%-22.50% | -31.17%-25.91% | -62.91%-50.43% |
| Max drawdown duration | KURE FLCH | 68d84d | 325d301d | 619d422d | 1815d1485d |
Trading data
KURE | FLCH | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $17.28 | $22.18 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $17.27 | $22.07 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KURE | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KURE | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $17.28 | $22.18 |
| 1D performance | +0.06% | +0.50% |
| AuM | $98.82 M | $301.65 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
KURE | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index | FTSE China RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 893 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 31, 2018 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KURE
China
86.22%
Switzerland
8.84%
Other
4.94%
FLCH
China
91.25%
Other
8.75%
Sectors
KURE
Healthcare
98.15%
Other
1.85%
FLCH
Technology
26.42%
Finance
21.69%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
14.33%
Industrials
8.32%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.05%
Other
22.18%
Advertisement
Diversification
KURE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.95%
FLCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
KURE
BeOne Medicines Ltd.
8.84%
Innovent Biologics, Inc.
8.80%
WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc.
7.51%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
5.79%
Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
4.59%
Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.27%
Akeso, Inc.
3.72%
CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd.
3.68%
Sino Biopharmaceutical Ltd.
3.39%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
3.35%
Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.
2.85%
3SBio, Inc.
2.49%
Yunnan Baiyao Group Co., Ltd.
2.30%
Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.
2.27%
Aier Eye Hospital Group Co., Ltd.
2.10%
FLCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.69%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.07%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.60%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.60%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.28%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.83%
Meituan
1.75%
NetEase, Inc.
1.69%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.69%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.62%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.33%
JD.com, Inc.
1.17%
Baidu, Inc.
1.04%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.99%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
0.88%
Frequently asked questions about KURE and FLCH
How have the KURE and FLCH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, KURE is up 0.17% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCH has lost -7.68%. That puts KURE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KURE or FLCH?
Year-to-date, the KURE ETF saw +$22M in flows, compared to +$48M for FLCH.
Which ETF is more volatile: KURE or FLCH?
Over the past year, KURE had a volatility of 27.53%, while FLCH experienced 19.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: KURE or FLCH?
As of July 30, 2026, KURE holds $98.82 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLCH manages $301.65 M.
What sectors do the KURE and FLCH ETFs invest in?
KURE leans toward sectors like Healthcare. Meanwhile, FLCH focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the KURE ETF and FLCH ETF?
KURE top holdings include BeOne Medicines Ltd., Innovent Biologics, Inc. and WuXi Biologics (Cayman), Inc.. FLCH holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: KURE or FLCH?
KURE holds 45 securities with 65.95% of its assets in the top 15. FLCH has 998 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.2%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
