Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KRMAvsRECSETF Comparison
Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. KRMA's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. KRMA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.43%, versus 0.15% for RECS. KRMA is down -1.36% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with -1.74% YTD performance, and +$271M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KRMA and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KRMA vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KRMA RECS | -2.38%-3.18% | -2.33%-2.21% | -1.36%-1.74% | +18.00%+21.89% | +61.61%+81.95% | +59.56%+97.25% |
| Flows | KRMA RECS | -+$166M | -$54M+$486M | -$4M+$271M | -$580M+$2.27B | -$776M+$4.22B | -$560M+$4.19B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KRMA RECS | +12.13%+11.67% | +18.28%+18.00% | +14.71%+14.48% | +17.15%+16.56% |
| Max drawdown | KRMA RECS | -3.47%-3.59% | -13.84%-13.84% | -19.16%-18.49% | -25.82%-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | KRMA RECS | 64d29d | 45d45d | 158d126d | 756d573d |
KRMA | RECS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.35 | $39.52 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $42.79 | $40.10 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KRMA | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KRMA | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.35 | $39.52 |
| 1D performance | -1.02% | -1.45% |
| AuM | $110.02 M | $4.95 B |
| E/R | 0.43% | 0.15% |
KRMA | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Concinnity Conscious Companies Index | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 141 | 331 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 11, 2016 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KRMA and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, KRMA is down -1.36% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has lost -1.74%. That puts KRMA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KRMA or RECS?
Year-to-date, the KRMA ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to +$271M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: KRMA or RECS?
Over the past year, KRMA had a volatility of 18.28%, while RECS experienced 18%.
Which ETF is bigger: KRMA or RECS?
As of March 11, 2026, KRMA holds $110.02 M in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $4.95 B.
What sectors do the KRMA and RECS ETFs invest in?
KRMA leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the KRMA ETF and RECS ETF?
KRMA top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: KRMA or RECS?
KRMA holds 142 securities with 34.81% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 336 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.28%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
