Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KRMAvsJQUAETF Comparison
Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. JPMorgan US Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. KRMA's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, JQUA's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. KRMA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.43%, versus 0.12% for JQUA. KRMA is down -1.36% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. JQUA performs better with 0.19% YTD performance, and -$596M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KRMA and JQUA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KRMA vs JQUA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KRMA JQUA | -2.60%-1.42% | -2.09%-0.53% | -1.36%+0.19% | +16.66%+12.38% | +61.17%+69.09% | +60.97%+84.31% |
| Flows | KRMA JQUA | --$459M | -$54M-$572M | -$4M-$596M | -$580M+$752M | -$776M+$4.37B | -$560M+$4.81B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KRMA JQUA | +12.14%+10.88% | +18.32%+16.57% | +14.71%+13.52% | +17.15%+15.60% |
| Max drawdown | KRMA JQUA | -3.47%-2.80% | -13.84%-12.33% | -19.16%-16.77% | -25.82%-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | KRMA JQUA | 63d42d | 45d46d | 158d134d | 756d560d |
KRMA | JQUA | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.79 | $63.08 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $42.79 | $63.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KRMA | JQUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KRMA | JQUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.79 | $63.08 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.33% |
| AuM | $110.02 M | $7.02 B |
| E/R | 0.43% | 0.12% |
KRMA | JQUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Concinnity Conscious Companies Index | JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 141 | 279 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 11, 2016 | November 9, 2017 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KRMA and JQUA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, KRMA is down -1.36% year-to-date (YTD), while JQUA has returned 0.19%. That puts JQUA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KRMA or JQUA?
Year-to-date, the KRMA ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to -$596M for JQUA.
Which ETF is more volatile: KRMA or JQUA?
Over the past year, KRMA had a volatility of 18.32%, while JQUA experienced 16.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: KRMA or JQUA?
As of March 10, 2026, KRMA holds $110.02 M in assets under management (AUM), while JQUA manages $7.02 B.
What sectors do the KRMA and JQUA ETFs invest in?
KRMA leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, JQUA focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the KRMA ETF and JQUA ETF?
KRMA top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. JQUA holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and META PLATFORMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: KRMA or JQUA?
KRMA holds 142 securities with 34.81% of its assets in the top 15. JQUA has 289 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.05%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
