Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KRMAvsGSLCETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. KRMA's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, GSLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. KRMA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.43%, versus 0.09% for GSLC. KRMA is down -2.76% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. GSLC performs better with -1.81% YTD performance, and -$289M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KRMA and GSLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KRMA vs GSLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KRMA GSLC | -2.11%-2.53% | -2.71%-2.66% | -2.76%-1.81% | +16.19%+20.14% | +59.32%+75.78% | +56.76%+76.62% |
| Flows | KRMA GSLC | -+$33M | -$54M-$214M | -$4M-$289M | -$580M-$242M | -$776M-$2.25B | -$560M-$3.72B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KRMA GSLC | +12.29%+11.50% | +18.34%+18.01% | +14.72%+14.62% | +17.16%+16.63% |
| Max drawdown | KRMA GSLC | -4.59%-3.81% | -13.84%-13.56% | -19.16%-18.65% | -25.82%-24.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | KRMA GSLC | 65d58d | 45d45d | 158d126d | 756d713d |
KRMA | GSLC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.94 | $127.08 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $42.18 | $127.94 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KRMA | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KRMA | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.94 | $127.08 |
| 1D performance | -0.56% | -0.67% |
| AuM | $108.46 M | $14.45 B |
| E/R | 0.43% | 0.09% |
KRMA | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Concinnity Conscious Companies Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 141 | 405 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 11, 2016 | September 17, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KRMA and GSLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, KRMA is down -2.76% year-to-date (YTD), while GSLC has lost -1.81%. That puts GSLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KRMA or GSLC?
Year-to-date, the KRMA ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to -$289M for GSLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: KRMA or GSLC?
Over the past year, KRMA had a volatility of 18.34%, while GSLC experienced 18.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: KRMA or GSLC?
As of March 12, 2026, KRMA holds $108.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSLC manages $14.45 B.
What sectors do the KRMA and GSLC ETFs invest in?
KRMA leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, GSLC focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the KRMA ETF and GSLC ETF?
KRMA top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. GSLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: KRMA or GSLC?
KRMA holds 142 securities with 34.81% of its assets in the top 15. GSLC has 432 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.3%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
