Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KRMAvsFLCCETF Comparison
Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Core ETF (FLCC) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. KRMA's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, FLCC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. KRMA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.43%, versus 0.44% for FLCC. KRMA is down -1.36% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. FLCC performs worse with -2.02% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KRMA and FLCC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KRMA vs FLCC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KRMA FLCC | -2.38%-1.80% | -2.33%-2.85% | -1.36%-2.02% | +18.00%+18.75% | +61.61%n/a | +59.56%n/a |
| Flows | KRMA FLCC | --$9M | -$54M+$3M | -$4M+$3M | -$580M+$29M | -$776M- | -$560M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KRMA FLCC | +12.13%+12.46% | +18.28%+19.42% | +14.71%n/a | +17.15%n/a |
| Max drawdown | KRMA FLCC | -3.47%-4.07% | -13.84%-14.97% | -19.16%n/a | -25.82%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | KRMA FLCC | 64d63d | 45d45d | 158dn/a | 756dn/a |
KRMA | FLCC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.18 | $31.32 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $42.79 | $31.82 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KRMA | FLCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KRMA | FLCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.18 | $31.32 |
| 1D performance | -1.42% | -1.56% |
| AuM | $110.02 M | $50.13 M |
| E/R | 0.43% | 0.44% |
KRMA | FLCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Concinnity Conscious Companies Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 141 | 141 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 11, 2016 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KRMA and FLCC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, KRMA is down -1.36% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCC has lost -2.02%. That puts KRMA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KRMA or FLCC?
Year-to-date, the KRMA ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to +$3M for FLCC.
Which ETF is more volatile: KRMA or FLCC?
Over the past year, KRMA had a volatility of 18.28%, while FLCC experienced 19.42%.
Which ETF is bigger: KRMA or FLCC?
As of March 11, 2026, KRMA holds $110.02 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLCC manages $50.13 M.
What sectors do the KRMA and FLCC ETFs invest in?
KRMA leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, FLCC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the KRMA ETF and FLCC ETF?
KRMA top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. FLCC holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, MICROSOFT-T and NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: KRMA or FLCC?
KRMA holds 142 securities with 34.81% of its assets in the top 15. FLCC has 142 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.44%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
