Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KRMAvsAFLGETF Comparison
Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. KRMA's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, AFLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. KRMA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.43%, versus 0.55% for AFLG. KRMA is down -2.76% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. AFLG performs better with 1.09% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KRMA and AFLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KRMA vs AFLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KRMA AFLG | -2.11%-3.01% | -2.71%-0.07% | -2.76%+1.09% | +16.19%+19.95% | +59.32%+77.90% | +56.76%+76.51% |
| Flows | KRMA AFLG | -+$20M | -$54M+$22M | -$4M+$16M | -$580M+$227M | -$776M+$425M | -$560M+$423M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KRMA AFLG | +12.29%+11.47% | +18.34%+17.18% | +14.72%+14.14% | +17.16%+16.20% |
| Max drawdown | KRMA AFLG | -4.59%-3.62% | -13.84%-12.96% | -19.16%-17.58% | -25.82%-23.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | KRMA AFLG | 65d14d | 45d45d | 158d205d | 756d741d |
KRMA | AFLG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 5:03 PM | $42.35 | $39.14 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $42.79 | $39.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KRMA | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KRMA | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.35 | $39.14 |
| 1D performance | -1.02% | -1.14% |
| AuM | $108.46 M | $485.08 M |
| E/R | 0.43% | 0.55% |
KRMA | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Concinnity Conscious Companies Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 141 | 235 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 11, 2016 | December 3, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KRMA and AFLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, KRMA is down -2.76% year-to-date (YTD), while AFLG has returned 1.09%. That puts AFLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KRMA or AFLG?
Year-to-date, the KRMA ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to +$16M for AFLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: KRMA or AFLG?
Over the past year, KRMA had a volatility of 18.34%, while AFLG experienced 17.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: KRMA or AFLG?
As of March 12, 2026, KRMA holds $108.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while AFLG manages $485.08 M.
What sectors do the KRMA and AFLG ETFs invest in?
KRMA leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, AFLG focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the KRMA ETF and AFLG ETF?
KRMA top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. AFLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: KRMA or AFLG?
KRMA holds 142 securities with 34.81% of its assets in the top 15. AFLG has 245 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.87%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
