KPROvsGXCETF Comparison
ETF 1
KPRO
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.19%
VS
KraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KPRO) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) is part of the China Blended Cap segment. KPRO's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. In contrast, GXC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. KPRO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1%, versus 0.59% for GXC. KPRO is down -6.37% year-to-date (YTD) with +$709K in YTD flows. GXC performs worse with -9.34% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KPRO and GXC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KPRO vs GXC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KPRO GXC | -1.64%-3.98% | -1.53%-3.19% | -6.37%-9.34% | -8.06%-12.94% | n/a+31.10% | n/a-10.45% |
| Flows | KPRO GXC | -$1K+$5M | -$659K+$18M | +$709K+$19M | +$709K+$43M | --$407M | --$653M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KPRO GXC | +6.31%+17.77% | +8.99%+18.67% | n/a+22.40% | n/a+24.73% |
| Max drawdown | KPRO GXC | -3.91%-6.73% | -11.33%-19.17% | n/a-23.08% | n/a-47.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | KPRO GXC | 36d44d | 345d349d | n/a284d | n/a1437d |
Trading data
KPRO | GXC | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.36 | $87.26 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $26.38 | $86.51 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KPRO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKPRO | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KPRO | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.36 | $87.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.86% |
| AuM | $3.29 M | $460.72 M |
| E/R | 1% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
KPRO | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | S&P China BMI Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 1173 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2024 | March 20, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KPRO
China
74.31%
Ireland
7.25%
Other
18.44%
GXC
China
88.27%
Other
11.73%
Sectors
KPRO
Technology
35.81%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
24.89%
Consumer Services
12.98%
Other
26.32%
GXC
Technology
24.23%
Finance
20.15%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
14.58%
Industrials
9.29%
Other
31.75%
Advertisement
Diversification
KPRO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.39%
GXC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
KPRO
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.01%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.57%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
7.25%
Meituan
7.20%
NetEase, Inc.
5.58%
JD.com, Inc.
3.87%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.79%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.51%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
3.39%
Kuaishou Technology
3.35%
JD Health International, Inc.
3.28%
Kanzhun Ltd.
3.20%
Bilibili, Inc.
3.19%
Baidu, Inc.
3.16%
TAL Education Group
3.03%
GXC
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.40%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.08%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.32%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.13%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
1.96%
Meituan
1.88%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.80%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.60%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.38%
NetEase, Inc.
1.31%
JD.com, Inc.
1.29%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.26%
Baidu, Inc.
0.88%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.81%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.78%
Frequently asked questions about KPRO and GXC
How have the KPRO and GXC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, KPRO is down -6.37% year-to-date (YTD), while GXC has lost -9.34%. That puts KPRO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KPRO or GXC?
Year-to-date, the KPRO ETF saw +$709K in flows, compared to +$19M for GXC.
Which ETF is more volatile: KPRO or GXC?
Over the past year, KPRO had a volatility of 8.99%, while GXC experienced 18.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: KPRO or GXC?
As of September 15, 2026, KPRO holds $3.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while GXC manages $460.72 M.
What sectors do the KPRO and GXC ETFs invest in?
KPRO leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, GXC focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the KPRO ETF and GXC ETF?
KPRO top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and PDD Holdings, Inc.. GXC holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: KPRO or GXC?
KPRO holds 33 securities with 70.39% of its assets in the top 15. GXC has 1236 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.88%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KPRO & GXC
Advertisement
