KONGvsBIBLETF Comparison
VS
Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. KONG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, BIBL's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. KONG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.41% for BIBL. KONG is up 6.19% year-to-date (YTD) with -$737K in YTD flows. BIBL performs better with 20.47% YTD performance, and +$59M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KONG and BIBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KONG vs BIBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KONG BIBL | -1.85%-5.92% | +6.73%-2.24% | +6.19%+20.47% | +6.85%+25.26% | +29.03%+72.25% | +32.64%+51.03% |
| Flows | KONG BIBL | -+$8M | -+$20M | -$737K+$59M | +$25K+$81M | -$10M+$20M | -$948K+$117M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KONG BIBL | +11.11%+18.41% | +11.43%+17.83% | +11.77%+17.82% | +13.19%+20.26% |
| Max drawdown | KONG BIBL | -4.51%-7.95% | -8.51%-9.07% | -15.24%-20.33% | -17.74%-30.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | KONG BIBL | 21d79d | 123d56d | 315d233d | 713d812d |
Trading data
KONG | BIBL | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.11 | |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $54.02 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KONG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKONG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KONG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $54.11 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.16% |
| AuM | $22.66 M | $488.79 M |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.41% |
Characteristics
KONG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Formidable | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Inspire 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 36 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 21, 2021 | October 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KONG
USA
99.58%
Other
0.42%
BIBL
USA
99.49%
Other
0.51%
Sectors
KONG
Technology
39.08%
Industrials
18.09%
Healthcare
15.49%
Finance
13.31%
Other
14.03%
BIBL
Technology
31.93%
Industrials
21.44%
Finance
19.83%
Energy
7.57%
Other
19.23%
Advertisement
Diversification
KONG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.89%
BIBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
KONG
Microsoft Corp.
5.77%
ServiceNow, Inc.
5.48%
Fastenal Co.
4.03%
F5, Inc.
3.95%
Snap-On, Inc.
3.49%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.47%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
3.47%
Texas Pacific Land Corp.
3.38%
EMCOR Group, Inc.
3.33%
Synopsys, Inc.
3.09%
Chemed Corp.
3.05%
Arista Networks, Inc.
2.94%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.89%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.86%
PulteGroup, Inc.
2.70%
BIBL
Caterpillar, Inc.
7.57%
Arista Networks, Inc.
5.16%
KLA Corp.
4.64%
Amphenol Corp.
4.08%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
3.65%
Welltower, Inc.
3.57%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
2.69%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.67%
The Progressive Corp.
2.65%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.32%
Vertiv Holdings Co.
2.00%
SLB Ltd.
1.98%
Cintas Corp.
1.95%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
1.93%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
1.65%
Frequently asked questions about KONG and BIBL
How have the KONG and BIBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, KONG is up 6.19% year-to-date (YTD), while BIBL has returned 20.47%. That puts BIBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KONG or BIBL?
Year-to-date, the KONG ETF saw -$737K in flows, compared to +$59M for BIBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: KONG or BIBL?
Over the past year, KONG had a volatility of 11.43%, while BIBL experienced 17.83%.
Which ETF is bigger: KONG or BIBL?
As of September 17, 2026, KONG holds $22.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while BIBL manages $488.79 M.
What sectors do the KONG and BIBL ETFs invest in?
KONG leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, BIBL focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the KONG ETF and BIBL ETF?
KONG top holdings include Microsoft Corp., ServiceNow, Inc. and Fastenal Co.. BIBL holds in its top three: Caterpillar, Inc., Arista Networks, Inc. and KLA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: KONG or BIBL?
KONG holds 36 securities with 53.89% of its assets in the top 15. BIBL has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.51%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
