KONGvsBIBLETF Comparison
VS
Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Finance. KONG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.41% for BIBL. KONG is up 5.93% year-to-date (YTD) with -$737K in YTD flows. BIBL performs better with 22.48% YTD performance, and +$45M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KONG and BIBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KONG vs BIBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KONG BIBL | +2.31%-1.49% | +4.09%+2.71% | +5.93%+22.48% | +6.63%+30.80% | +27.88%+69.77% | +29.96%+54.67% |
| Flows | KONG BIBL | --$8M | -+$20M | -$737K+$45M | -$740K+$54M | -$10M+$11M | +$12M+$123M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KONG BIBL | +10.57%+20.58% | +11.14%+17.33% | +11.61%+17.70% | +13.16%+20.17% |
| Max drawdown | KONG BIBL | -4.02%-7.95% | -8.51%-9.07% | -15.24%-20.33% | -17.74%-30.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | KONG BIBL | 32d34d | 123d56d | 315d233d | 713d812d |
Trading data
KONG | BIBL | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $56.36 | |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $54.93 | |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KONG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKONG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KONG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $56.36 |
| 1D performance | – | +2.60% |
| AuM | $22.60 M | $483.21 M |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.41% |
Characteristics
KONG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Formidable | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Inspire 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 100 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 21, 2021 | October 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KONG
USA
97.09%
Other
2.91%
BIBL
USA
99.01%
Other
0.99%
Sectors
KONG
Technology
37%
Industrials
17.52%
Finance
16.67%
Healthcare
12.8%
Other
16.02%
BIBL
Technology
33.1%
Industrials
23.64%
Finance
21.1%
Other
22.16%
Advertisement
Diversification
KONG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57%
BIBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
KONG
Fastenal Co.
5.23%
ServiceNow, Inc.
5.03%
Microsoft Corp.
4.76%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.40%
F5, Inc.
4.20%
Texas Pacific Land Corp.
3.78%
Synopsys, Inc.
3.65%
EMCOR Group, Inc.
3.56%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.56%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
3.53%
Snap-On, Inc.
3.52%
Public Storage
3.02%
PulteGroup, Inc.
3.02%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.91%
Arista Networks, Inc.
2.84%
BIBL
Caterpillar, Inc.
9.98%
KLA Corp.
7.90%
Amphenol Corp.
4.81%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.78%
Welltower, Inc.
3.41%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
3.07%
Vertiv Holdings Co.
2.77%
Progressive Corp.
2.68%
Prologis, Inc.
2.64%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
2.52%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.39%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
1.82%
Cintas Corp.
1.58%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.56%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
1.49%
Frequently asked questions about KONG and BIBL
How have the KONG and BIBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, KONG is up 5.93% year-to-date (YTD), while BIBL has returned 22.48%. That puts BIBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KONG or BIBL?
Year-to-date, the KONG ETF saw -$737K in flows, compared to +$45M for BIBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: KONG or BIBL?
Over the past year, KONG had a volatility of 11.14%, while BIBL experienced 17.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: KONG or BIBL?
As of August 3, 2026, KONG holds $22.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while BIBL manages $483.21 M.
What sectors do the KONG and BIBL ETFs invest in?
KONG leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, BIBL focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the KONG ETF and BIBL ETF?
KONG top holdings include Fastenal Co., ServiceNow, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. BIBL holds in its top three: Caterpillar, Inc., KLA Corp. and Amphenol Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: KONG or BIBL?
KONG holds 33 securities with 57% of its assets in the top 15. BIBL has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.41%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
