KONGvsBIBLETF Comparison
VS
Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. KONG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, BIBL's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. KONG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.41% for BIBL. KONG is up 4.58% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. BIBL performs better with 17.52% YTD performance, and +$86M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KONG and BIBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KONG vs BIBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KONG BIBL | -2.06%-4.99% | +0.92%-4.04% | +4.58%+17.52% | +6.55%+17.05% | +32.18%+77.86% | +27.61%+42.14% |
| Flows | KONG BIBL | -$807K+$17M | -$807K+$41M | -$2M+$86M | -$2M+$93M | -$10M+$45M | -$2M+$139M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KONG BIBL | +12.63%+15.59% | +11.94%+18.04% | +11.89%+17.70% | +13.23%+20.24% |
| Max drawdown | KONG BIBL | -5.48%-8.22% | -8.51%-9.07% | -15.24%-20.33% | -17.74%-30.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | KONG BIBL | 64d77d | 123d56d | 315d233d | 713d812d |
Trading data
KONG | BIBL | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $52.57 | |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $52.82 | |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KONG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKONG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
KONG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $52.57 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.48% |
| AuM | $21.52 M | $502.23 M |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.41% |
Characteristics
KONG | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Formidable | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Inspire 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 34 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 21, 2021 | October 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KONG
USA
97.18%
Other
2.82%
BIBL
USA
99.35%
Other
0.65%
Sectors
KONG
Technology
39.9%
Industrials
18.94%
Healthcare
13.89%
Finance
13.53%
Other
13.74%
BIBL
Technology
34.32%
Industrials
20.48%
Finance
18.72%
Energy
7.37%
Other
19.11%
Advertisement
Diversification
KONG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.09%
BIBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.87%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
KONG
ServiceNow, Inc.
6.47%
Microsoft Corp.
6.24%
F5, Inc.
4.29%
Fastenal Co.
4.10%
EMCOR Group, Inc.
4.02%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.87%
Synopsys, Inc.
3.39%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
3.30%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.29%
Arista Networks, Inc.
3.25%
Texas Pacific Land Corp.
3.18%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.10%
Snap-On, Inc.
3.03%
Chemed Corp.
2.84%
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
2.73%
BIBL
Caterpillar, Inc.
7.58%
Arista Networks, Inc.
5.86%
KLA Corp.
4.99%
Amphenol Corp.
4.31%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
3.56%
Welltower, Inc.
3.53%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.97%
Parker-Hannifin Corp.
2.64%
The Progressive Corp.
2.61%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.61%
Vertiv Holdings Co.
2.01%
SLB Ltd.
1.96%
Cintas Corp.
1.87%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
1.84%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
1.53%
Frequently asked questions about KONG and BIBL
How have the KONG and BIBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, KONG is up 4.58% year-to-date (YTD), while BIBL has returned 17.52%. That puts BIBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KONG or BIBL?
Year-to-date, the KONG ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$86M for BIBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: KONG or BIBL?
Over the past year, KONG had a volatility of 11.94%, while BIBL experienced 18.04%.
Which ETF is bigger: KONG or BIBL?
As of October 30, 2026, KONG holds $21.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while BIBL manages $502.23 M.
What sectors do the KONG and BIBL ETFs invest in?
KONG leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, BIBL focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the KONG ETF and BIBL ETF?
KONG top holdings include ServiceNow, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and F5, Inc.. BIBL holds in its top three: Caterpillar, Inc., Arista Networks, Inc. and KLA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: KONG or BIBL?
KONG holds 34 securities with 57.09% of its assets in the top 15. BIBL has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.87%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
