Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KOMPvsILDRETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF (ILDR) belong to the same industry segment: Disruptive Technology. KOMP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, ILDR's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. KOMP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.75% for ILDR. KOMP is up 2.65% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. ILDR performs worse with -4.82% YTD performance, and +$18M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KOMP and ILDR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KOMP vs ILDR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KOMP ILDR | -3.69%-1.84% | -0.87%-6.86% | +2.65%-4.82% | +32.64%+32.69% | +56.39%+110.56% | -1.55%n/a |
| Flows | KOMP ILDR | +$10M+$3M | +$35M+$20M | +$15M+$18M | -$82M+$146M | -$19M+$198M | +$566M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KOMP ILDR | +25.26%+20.80% | +26.03%+26.11% | +22.59%+22.18% | +25.20%n/a |
| Max drawdown | KOMP ILDR | -9.74%-10.79% | -17.23%-17.97% | -24.98%-26.20% | -47.15%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | KOMP ILDR | 47d62d | 46d46d | 201d139d | 1821dn/a |
KOMP | ILDR | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $61.50 | $31.43 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $61.22 | $31.37 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KOMP | ILDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KOMP | ILDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.50 | $31.43 |
| 1D performance | +0.46% | +0.19% |
| AuM | $2.48 B | $222.33 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.75% |
KOMP | ILDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | SPDR | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 385 | 67 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 22, 2018 | May 26, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KOMP and ILDR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, KOMP is up 2.65% year-to-date (YTD), while ILDR has lost -4.82%. That puts KOMP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KOMP or ILDR?
Year-to-date, the KOMP ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to +$18M for ILDR.
Which ETF is more volatile: KOMP or ILDR?
Over the past year, KOMP had a volatility of 26.03%, while ILDR experienced 26.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: KOMP or ILDR?
As of March 10, 2026, KOMP holds $2.48 B in assets under management (AUM), while ILDR manages $222.33 M.
What sectors do the KOMP and ILDR ETFs invest in?
KOMP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, ILDR focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the KOMP ETF and ILDR ETF?
KOMP top holdings include ELBIT SYSTEMS, AEROVIRONMENT and TELEDYNE TECH. ILDR holds in its top three: NVIDIA, AMAZON.COM INC and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: KOMP or ILDR?
KOMP holds 476 securities with 13.56% of its assets in the top 15. ILDR has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.17%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
