Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KOMPvsGINNETF Comparison
SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) belong to the same industry segment: Disruptive Technology. KOMP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, GINN's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. KOMP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.5% for GINN. KOMP is up 3.11% year-to-date (YTD) with +$18M in YTD flows. GINN performs worse with -2.24% YTD performance, and -$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KOMP and GINN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KOMP vs GINN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KOMP GINN | -2.14%-3.04% | -1.47%-3.65% | +3.11%-2.24% | +32.71%+21.02% | +57.24%+71.66% | -5.92%+31.64% |
| Flows | KOMP GINN | +$12M- | +$38M-$22M | +$18M-$4M | -$80M-$71M | -$17M-$254M | +$572M-$266M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KOMP GINN | +25.18%+13.63% | +26.03%+18.44% | +22.59%+16.29% | +25.09%+20.21% |
| Max drawdown | KOMP GINN | -9.74%-6.39% | -17.23%-16.03% | -24.98%-21.86% | -47.15%-40.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | KOMP GINN | 48d57d | 46d46d | 201d127d | 1822d1096d |
KOMP | GINN | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $60.34 | $70.02 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $61.50 | $71.34 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KOMP | GINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KOMP | GINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $60.34 | $70.02 |
| 1D performance | -1.89% | -1.84% |
| AuM | $2.49 B | $207.55 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.5% |
KOMP | GINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index | Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 385 | 400 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 22, 2018 | November 6, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KOMP and GINN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, KOMP is up 3.11% year-to-date (YTD), while GINN has lost -2.24%. That puts KOMP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KOMP or GINN?
Year-to-date, the KOMP ETF saw +$18M in flows, compared to -$4M for GINN.
Which ETF is more volatile: KOMP or GINN?
Over the past year, KOMP had a volatility of 26.03%, while GINN experienced 18.44%.
Which ETF is bigger: KOMP or GINN?
As of March 11, 2026, KOMP holds $2.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while GINN manages $207.55 M.
What sectors do the KOMP and GINN ETFs invest in?
KOMP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, GINN focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the KOMP ETF and GINN ETF?
KOMP top holdings include ELBIT SYSTEMS, AEROVIRONMENT and TELEDYNE TECH. GINN holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, NVIDIA and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: KOMP or GINN?
KOMP holds 476 securities with 13.56% of its assets in the top 15. GINN has 456 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.87%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
