Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KLMTvsNZACETF Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. KLMT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.12% for NZAC. KLMT is up 0.75% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. NZAC performs worse with -1.64% YTD performance, and -$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KLMT and NZAC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KLMT vs NZAC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KLMT NZAC | -3.15%-2.73% | +0.49%-1.67% | +0.75%-1.64% | +24.18%+21.34% | n/a+66.98% | n/a+54.90% |
| Flows | KLMT NZAC | --$9M | --$9M | --$9M | -$3M-$5M | --$140M | -+$13M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KLMT NZAC | +11.97%+10.38% | +16.90%+13.93% | n/a+12.14% | n/a+13.90% |
| Max drawdown | KLMT NZAC | -4.54%-4.17% | -13.65%-12.40% | n/a-15.87% | n/a-27.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | KLMT NZAC | 14d42d | 45d37d | n/a86d | n/a763d |
KLMT | NZAC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.17 | $41.46 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $31.21 | $42.17 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KLMT | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KLMT | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.17 | $41.46 |
| 1D performance | -0.12% | -1.67% |
| AuM | $1.42 B | $168.60 M |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.12% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KLMT and NZAC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, KLMT is up 0.75% year-to-date (YTD), while NZAC has lost -1.64%. That puts KLMT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KLMT or NZAC?
Year-to-date, the KLMT ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$9M for NZAC.
Which ETF is more volatile: KLMT or NZAC?
Over the past year, KLMT had a volatility of 16.9%, while NZAC experienced 13.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: KLMT or NZAC?
As of March 11, 2026, KLMT holds $1.42 B in assets under management (AUM), while NZAC manages $168.60 M.
What sectors do the KLMT and NZAC ETFs invest in?
KLMT leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, NZAC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the KLMT ETF and NZAC ETF?
KLMT top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. NZAC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: KLMT or NZAC?
KLMT holds 502 securities with 28.44% of its assets in the top 15. NZAC has 677 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.99%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
