Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
KLMTvsACWIETF Comparison
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. KLMT's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, ACWI's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. KLMT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.1%, versus 0.32% for ACWI. KLMT is down -1.71% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. ACWI performs better with -1.43% YTD performance, and +$2.87B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KLMT and ACWI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KLMT vs ACWI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KLMT ACWI | -4.29%-4.35% | -0.97%-0.68% | -1.71%-1.43% | +21.99%+23.16% | n/a+70.61% | n/a+59.57% |
| Flows | KLMT ACWI | -+$1.30B | -+$3.68B | -+$2.87B | -$3M+$5.06B | -+$712M | -+$4.69B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KLMT ACWI | +12.42%+12.75% | +16.97%+16.62% | n/a+13.72% | n/a+15.57% |
| Max drawdown | KLMT ACWI | -6.12%-6.07% | -13.65%-13.45% | n/a-16.56% | n/a-26.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | KLMT ACWI | 16d16d | 45d45d | n/a87d | n/a750d |
KLMT | ACWI | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.39 | $139.54 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $30.63 | $140.45 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
KLMT | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
KLMT | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.39 | $139.54 |
| 1D performance | -0.76% | -0.65% |
| AuM | $1.38 B | $27.58 B |
| E/R | 0.1% | 0.32% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the KLMT and ACWI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, KLMT is down -1.71% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWI has lost -1.43%. That puts ACWI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KLMT or ACWI?
Year-to-date, the KLMT ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$2.87B for ACWI.
Which ETF is more volatile: KLMT or ACWI?
Over the past year, KLMT had a volatility of 16.97%, while ACWI experienced 16.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: KLMT or ACWI?
As of March 13, 2026, KLMT holds $1.38 B in assets under management (AUM), while ACWI manages $27.58 B.
What sectors do the KLMT and ACWI ETFs invest in?
KLMT leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ACWI focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the KLMT ETF and ACWI ETF?
KLMT top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ACWI holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: KLMT or ACWI?
KLMT holds 502 securities with 28.44% of its assets in the top 15. ACWI has 2264 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.6%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
