KLIPvsBUFRETF Comparison
ETF 1
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-1.38%
VS
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and FT Vest Fund of Buffer ETF (BUFR) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. KLIP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.94%, versus 0.95% for BUFR. KLIP is down -15.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$729K in YTD flows. BUFR performs better with 10.36% YTD performance, and +$1.72B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KLIP and BUFR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KLIP vs BUFR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KLIP BUFR | -3.86%+0.83% | -9.02%+4.32% | -15.54%+10.36% | -18.60%+11.82% | +9.06%+57.94% | n/a+60.13% |
| Flows | KLIP BUFR | -$5M+$208M | -$5M+$577M | +$729K+$1.72B | +$11M+$2.11B | +$76M+$6.30B | -+$7.99B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KLIP BUFR | +13.10%+5.39% | +15.72%+6.55% | +16.99%+8.87% | n/a+10.67% |
| Max drawdown | KLIP BUFR | -10.03%-1.14% | -21.36%-4.57% | -21.36%-12.72% | n/a-13.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | KLIP BUFR | 81d17d | 274d42d | 274d124d | n/a513d |
Trading data
KLIP | BUFR | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.56 | $37.40 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $20.62 | $37.82 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KLIP | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.56 | $37.40 |
| 1D performance | -0.29% | -1.11% |
| AuM | $81.36 M | $11.04 B |
| E/R | 0.94% | 0.95% |
Characteristics
KLIP | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | KraneShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 12, 2023 | August 10, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KLIP
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Sectors
KLIP
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
KLIP
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
KLIP
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about KLIP and BUFR
How have the KLIP and BUFR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, KLIP is down -15.54% year-to-date (YTD), while BUFR has returned 10.36%. That puts BUFR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KLIP or BUFR?
Year-to-date, the KLIP ETF saw +$729K in flows, compared to +$1.72B for BUFR.
Which ETF is more volatile: KLIP or BUFR?
Over the past year, KLIP had a volatility of 15.72%, while BUFR experienced 6.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: KLIP or BUFR?
As of October 30, 2026, KLIP holds $81.36 M in assets under management (AUM), while BUFR manages $11.04 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about KLIP & BUFR
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet & Covered Call Strategy ETF (NYSE Arca: KLIP)
February 25, 2023
KLIP
Generate Income With This China Internet Covered Call ETF
February 14, 2023
KLIP
Advertisement
Advertisement
