KBUFvsGXCETF Comparison
ETF 1
KBUF
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.3%
VS
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) is part of the China Blended Cap segment. KBUF's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. In contrast, GXC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. KBUF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.97%, versus 0.59% for GXC. KBUF is down -16.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. GXC performs better with -8.92% YTD performance, and +$23M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KBUF and GXC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KBUF vs GXC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KBUF GXC | -6.17%-2.16% | -4.77%-3.88% | -16.30%-8.92% | -18.43%-12.47% | n/a+31.03% | n/a-12.81% |
| Flows | KBUF GXC | +$2K+$9M | +$631K+$22M | +$3M+$23M | +$3M+$48M | --$403M | --$649M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KBUF GXC | +12.08%+18.01% | +13.84%+18.69% | n/a+22.40% | n/a+24.75% |
| Max drawdown | KBUF GXC | -8.40%-7.81% | -21.92%-19.17% | n/a-23.08% | n/a-47.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | KBUF GXC | 32d50d | 341d347d | n/a284d | n/a1437d |
Trading data
KBUF | GXC | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.58 | $87.28 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $25.64 | $88.01 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KBUF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKBUF | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KBUF | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.58 | $87.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | -0.83% |
| AuM | $6.38 M | $467.23 M |
| E/R | 0.97% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
KBUF | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | S&P China BMI Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 1173 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2024 | March 20, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KBUF
China
77.26%
Ireland
7.53%
Other
15.2%
GXC
China
88.27%
Other
11.73%
Sectors
KBUF
Technology
37.23%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
25.88%
Consumer Services
13.5%
Other
23.4%
GXC
Technology
24.23%
Finance
20.15%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
14.58%
Industrials
9.29%
Other
31.75%
Diversification
KBUF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.19%
GXC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
KBUF
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.37%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.87%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
7.53%
Meituan
7.49%
NetEase, Inc.
5.80%
JD.com, Inc.
4.03%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.94%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.65%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
3.53%
Kuaishou Technology
3.48%
JD Health International, Inc.
3.41%
Kanzhun Ltd.
3.33%
Bilibili, Inc.
3.32%
Baidu, Inc.
3.28%
TAL Education Group
3.15%
GXC
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
10.40%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.08%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.32%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.13%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
1.96%
Meituan
1.88%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.80%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.60%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.38%
NetEase, Inc.
1.31%
JD.com, Inc.
1.29%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.26%
Baidu, Inc.
0.88%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.81%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.78%
Frequently asked questions about KBUF and GXC
How have the KBUF and GXC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, KBUF is down -16.3% year-to-date (YTD), while GXC has lost -8.92%. That puts GXC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KBUF or GXC?
Year-to-date, the KBUF ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$23M for GXC.
Which ETF is more volatile: KBUF or GXC?
Over the past year, KBUF had a volatility of 13.84%, while GXC experienced 18.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: KBUF or GXC?
As of September 11, 2026, KBUF holds $6.38 M in assets under management (AUM), while GXC manages $467.23 M.
What sectors do the KBUF and GXC ETFs invest in?
KBUF leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, GXC focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the KBUF ETF and GXC ETF?
KBUF top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and PDD Holdings, Inc.. GXC holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: KBUF or GXC?
KBUF holds 33 securities with 73.19% of its assets in the top 15. GXC has 1236 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.88%.
Advertisement
Latest news about KBUF & GXC
Advertisement
