KBUFvsFLCHETF Comparison
ETF 1
KBUF
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.3%
VS
KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is part of the China Blended Cap segment. KBUF's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. In contrast, FLCH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. KBUF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.97%, versus 0.19% for FLCH. KBUF is down -16.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. FLCH performs better with -10.89% YTD performance, and +$75M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KBUF and FLCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
KBUF vs FLCH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KBUF FLCH | -6.17%-1.98% | -4.77%-3.70% | -16.30%-10.89% | -18.43%-14.82% | n/a+30.97% | n/a-13.49% |
| Flows | KBUF FLCH | +$2K-$8M | +$631K+$57M | +$3M+$75M | +$3M+$123M | -+$191M | -+$222M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KBUF FLCH | +12.08%+19.40% | +13.84%+19.56% | n/a+23.26% | n/a+26.44% |
| Max drawdown | KBUF FLCH | -8.40%-8.75% | -21.92%-22.50% | n/a-22.50% | n/a-49.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | KBUF FLCH | 32d45d | 341d347d | n/a347d | n/a1422d |
Trading data
KBUF | FLCH | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.58 | $20.91 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $25.64 | $21.12 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KBUF
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexKBUF | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KBUF | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.58 | $20.91 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | -0.99% |
| AuM | $6.38 M | $316.49 M |
| E/R | 0.97% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
KBUF | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | KraneShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE China RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 893 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 8, 2024 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
KBUF
China
77.26%
Ireland
7.53%
Other
15.2%
FLCH
China
91.37%
Other
8.63%
Sectors
KBUF
Technology
37.23%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
25.88%
Consumer Services
13.5%
Other
23.4%
FLCH
Technology
25.27%
Finance
21.73%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.64%
Industrials
7.78%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.36%
Other
22.22%
Advertisement
Diversification
KBUF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.19%
FLCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.86%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
KBUF
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.37%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.87%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
7.53%
Meituan
7.49%
NetEase, Inc.
5.80%
JD.com, Inc.
4.03%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.94%
KE Holdings, Inc.
3.65%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
3.53%
Kuaishou Technology
3.48%
JD Health International, Inc.
3.41%
Kanzhun Ltd.
3.33%
Bilibili, Inc.
3.32%
Baidu, Inc.
3.28%
TAL Education Group
3.15%
FLCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.67%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
9.30%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.64%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.66%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.35%
Xiaomi Corp.
2.27%
Meituan
2.25%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.68%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.66%
NetEase, Inc.
1.59%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.51%
JD.com, Inc.
1.35%
Baidu, Inc.
1.02%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.97%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.93%
Frequently asked questions about KBUF and FLCH
How have the KBUF and FLCH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, KBUF is down -16.3% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCH has lost -10.89%. That puts FLCH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KBUF or FLCH?
Year-to-date, the KBUF ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$75M for FLCH.
Which ETF is more volatile: KBUF or FLCH?
Over the past year, KBUF had a volatility of 13.84%, while FLCH experienced 19.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: KBUF or FLCH?
As of September 11, 2026, KBUF holds $6.38 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLCH manages $316.49 M.
What sectors do the KBUF and FLCH ETFs invest in?
KBUF leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, FLCH focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the KBUF ETF and FLCH ETF?
KBUF top holdings include Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and PDD Holdings, Inc.. FLCH holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: KBUF or FLCH?
KBUF holds 33 securities with 73.19% of its assets in the top 15. FLCH has 998 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.86%.
Advertisement
