KBFRvsIWMIETF Comparison
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed 10 Buffer ETF (KBFR) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. KBFR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.78% for IWMI. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KBFR and IWMI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
KBFR vs IWMI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | KBFR IWMI | -1.03%-1.78% | +6.60%+5.66% | n/a+16.10% | n/a+30.25% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | KBFR IWMI | +$1M+$128M | +$3M+$298M | -+$619M | -+$836M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | KBFR IWMI | +11.08%+15.01% | n/a+15.42% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | KBFR IWMI | -2.99%-3.47% | n/a-8.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | KBFR IWMI | 12d16d | n/a46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
KBFR | IWMI | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 4:00 PM | $52.42 | |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $51.76 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
KBFR | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $52.42 |
| 1D performance | – | +1.28% |
| AuM | $10.85 M | $1.11 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.78% |
KBFR | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 814 | 1944 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 24, 2026 | June 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
