New

ETF model portfolios designed for real investor needs. Discover →

Advertisement
Advertisement

KBAvsMCHETF Comparison

ETF 1
KBA

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF

This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
+0.49%
VS
ETF 2
MCH

Matthews China Active ETF

This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
+0.49%

KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) and Matthews China Active ETF (MCH) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. KBA's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, MCH's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. Both KBA and MCH have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%. KBA is up 4.47% year-to-date (YTD) with -$93M in YTD flows. MCH performs worse with -3.57% YTD performance, and -$580K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of KBA and MCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

KBA vs MCH performance and flow charts

Performance

-6.0-5.0-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 7Sep 14

Cumulative Flows

-1,500,000-1,000,000-500,0000Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 7Sep 14

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
KBA
MCH
-5.26%-5.70%
-6.00%-8.49%
+4.47%-3.57%
+11.39%-8.21%
+49.60%+37.40%
+2.24%n/a
Flows
KBA
MCH
-$2M-$580K
-$7M-$580K
-$93M-$580K
-$127M-$1M
-$299M-$13M
-$256M-
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
KBA
MCH
+22.64%+23.36%
+19.33%+22.42%
+19.18%+25.41%
+19.95%n/a
Max drawdown
KBA
MCH
-9.73%-9.65%
-9.73%-15.02%
-19.76%-23.38%
-45.85%n/a
Max drawdown duration
KBA
MCH
86d87d
86d231d
316d309d
1604dn/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
KBA
MCH
Last sale
9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
$32.32
$27.79
Previous close
09/17/2026
$31.96
$27.51
Consolidated volume
09/17/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

MCH
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
KBA
MCH
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
KBA
MCH
Last price
$32.32
$27.79
1D performance
+1.11%
+1.03%
AuM$140.29 M$21.35 M
E/R0.79%0.79%
Characteristics
KBA
MCH
Management strategyPassiveActive
ProviderKraneSharesMatthews Asia
BenchmarkMSCI China A 50 Connect Index-
N° of holdings5052
Asset classEquities-
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateMarch 4, 2014July 13, 2022
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

KBA
China
99.61%
Other
0.39%
MCH
China
88.38%
Other
11.62%

Sectors

KBA
Technology
29.79%
Finance
18.68%
Industrials
18.27%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.3%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.41%
Other
15.55%
MCH
Finance
27.26%
Technology
26.59%
Industrials
12.03%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.27%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.75%
Other
16.11%
Advertisement

Diversification

KBA

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

59.43%
MCH

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

56.79%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
KBA
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
9.01%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
6.92%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
5.41%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
4.94%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
3.75%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
3.48%
CMOC Group Ltd.
3.47%
Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd.
3.20%
BYD Co., Ltd.
3.17%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.97%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.92%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
2.86%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
2.69%
Wanhua Chemical Group Co., Ltd.
2.38%
Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
2.26%
MCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
13.52%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
6.64%
Meituan
4.73%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
3.21%
China International Capital Corp. Ltd.
3.03%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
2.96%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
2.84%
JD.com, Inc.
2.80%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.78%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.74%
Jiangsu Zhongtian Technology Co., Ltd.
2.68%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
2.31%
China Merchants Securities Co., Ltd.
2.25%
New China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.
2.17%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.12%
Frequently asked questions about KBA and MCH

How have the KBA and MCH ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 16, 2026, KBA is up 4.47% year-to-date (YTD), while MCH has lost -3.57%. That puts KBA better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: KBA or MCH?

Year-to-date, the KBA ETF saw -$93M in flows, compared to -$580K for MCH.

Which ETF is more volatile: KBA or MCH?

Over the past year, KBA had a volatility of 19.33%, while MCH experienced 22.42%.

Which ETF is bigger: KBA or MCH?

As of September 16, 2026, KBA holds $140.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while MCH manages $21.35 M.

What sectors do the KBA and MCH ETFs invest in?

KBA leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, MCH focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the KBA ETF and MCH ETF?

KBA top holdings include Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. and Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.. MCH holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Meituan.

Which ETF is more diversified: KBA or MCH?

KBA holds 50 securities with 59.43% of its assets in the top 15. MCH has 53 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.79%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETF INVESTOR RESOURCES

Expert-Built ETF Portfolios, All in One Place

Don’t start from scratch. Discover ready-made ETF portfolios built by professionals to match different goals, timelines, and market views. Use them as inspiration or as a starting point for your own allocation.

Portfolio Builder